OB_Dirty Pete
Registered
Just dynoed the Busa after changing to 4 long stacks. Same dyno, same fuel, same prep same weather. I have Akra, full box cut, BMC and 100% synth oil.
In SAE corrected RWHP, the bike went from 165 to 162.1 peak rwhp. However, it makes 2 more rwhp ALL the way up the curve until 8500, where it quite graphically tucks under the stock stack setup by 3 ponies.
Previous correction factor: 104. Today's correction factor 102 (barometric pressure was the only difference). Uncorrected SAE peak rwhp was identical, with the 4 stacks showing 2 more horse all the way up the curve until peak where it's the same.
I'll reserve judgement until the Yosh cams are in. It's nice to have the mid range punch for the twisties.
This of course is only my particluar bike on this particular day. These results conflict with what MTRHD and Frank Adams are getting, but that doesn't make their results wrong or mine right. It's just one more bit of evidence to consider.
[This message has been edited by Dirty Pete (edited 15 April 2000).]
In SAE corrected RWHP, the bike went from 165 to 162.1 peak rwhp. However, it makes 2 more rwhp ALL the way up the curve until 8500, where it quite graphically tucks under the stock stack setup by 3 ponies.
Previous correction factor: 104. Today's correction factor 102 (barometric pressure was the only difference). Uncorrected SAE peak rwhp was identical, with the 4 stacks showing 2 more horse all the way up the curve until peak where it's the same.
I'll reserve judgement until the Yosh cams are in. It's nice to have the mid range punch for the twisties.
This of course is only my particluar bike on this particular day. These results conflict with what MTRHD and Frank Adams are getting, but that doesn't make their results wrong or mine right. It's just one more bit of evidence to consider.
[This message has been edited by Dirty Pete (edited 15 April 2000).]