I have always been told that the 99's were the fastest stock, and easiest to make faster. I was told that this was due to the fact that after 99, they "limited" the bikes through the computer. I was recently told by a friend that the 2003's were supposed to be the first bike that had as much potential (and was as fast stock) as the 1999. I was told that this was due to a newly remapped fuel system. Is there any truth to this? Were there any changes/performance increases made on the 2004 to combat the new 180hp R1, and 184hp ZX-10?
I am looking to purchase a Haybusa (possibly here real soon), and want to make sure I don't end up with a "bad" or "not as good" year. The other reason I ask is that I really like the silver/silver paint scheme and thus would prefer a 2003 (unless the 2004 is a faster bike).
I am looking to purchase a Haybusa (possibly here real soon), and want to make sure I don't end up with a "bad" or "not as good" year. The other reason I ask is that I really like the silver/silver paint scheme and thus would prefer a 2003 (unless the 2004 is a faster bike).