clean
Registered
Hi guys,
Simple and to the point here - I see these welded in one of two ways.
1. In the middle position between engaged and disengaged with the two pieces flush.
2. In the forward engaged position with one piece higher then the other (how it would be under load).
Now, I have read on this forum that they should be welded flush between engaged and disengaged - I believe this is incorrect as it would prevent the limiter body from fully engaging the clutch basket pawls below, and at the same time reducing the spring pressure as the whole assembly would be sitting "higher".
If welding in the forward locked position you retain the limiter assembly depth fully engaging the clutch basket lugs, and maintaining locked up spring pressure.
can anyone who has done this, and maybe seen both style mods confirm? I wanted to get the forum a definite CORRECT answer as I cant seem to pin this down anywhere. Nobody wants to overpay for one of those billet mods when this could be done for almost free.
Simple and to the point here - I see these welded in one of two ways.
1. In the middle position between engaged and disengaged with the two pieces flush.
2. In the forward engaged position with one piece higher then the other (how it would be under load).
Now, I have read on this forum that they should be welded flush between engaged and disengaged - I believe this is incorrect as it would prevent the limiter body from fully engaging the clutch basket pawls below, and at the same time reducing the spring pressure as the whole assembly would be sitting "higher".
If welding in the forward locked position you retain the limiter assembly depth fully engaging the clutch basket lugs, and maintaining locked up spring pressure.
can anyone who has done this, and maybe seen both style mods confirm? I wanted to get the forum a definite CORRECT answer as I cant seem to pin this down anywhere. Nobody wants to overpay for one of those billet mods when this could be done for almost free.