you might be able to resleeve the busa jugs ...there is only a 3mm difference in bore between the 95 1100 and the busa. I haven't had the head off yet ..... but 1.5mm doesn't sound like too much to give up.
just for reference the 1100s had a stroke 5.5mm shorter
You'ld prolly have to run flat top piston though to avoid valve clearance issues.
I ran a 90 1100 @ 1127cc/up 1mm valves/degreed cams/41mm kehins....and some other tweaks....with 152 rwhp. 1/4@9.40s
some comparisons.....busa on the right obviously.
Displacement: 1074 cc / Displacement: 1298 cc
Bore x stroke: 75.5 x 60.0 mm / Bore x stroke: 81.0 x 63.0 mm
Compression ratio: 11.2:1 / Compression ratio: 11.0:1
Wheelbase: 58.5 in. / Wheelbase: 58.5 in.
Seat height: 32.1 in. / Seat height: 31.7 in.
Fuel capacity: 5.5 gal. / Fuel capacity: 5.8 gal.
Fuel consumption (Hi/Low/Ave): 49/32/43 mi. / Fuel consumption (Hi/Low/Ave): 41/35/37 mi
Weight: 521 lb. dry; 554 lb. wet / Weight: 515 lb. dry; 550 lb. wet
Quarter mile: 10.50 @ 129.53 mph / Quarter mile: 9.86 @ 145.80 mph
Measured top speed: 164.00 mph / Measured top speed: 194.00 mph
funny that as far as we have come...it really isn't that far at all... except for that top speed thing.