OB_BarryW.
Registered
While dynos don't give the exact power value that a ram-air-assisted engine exhibits at speed, they are the most accurate tool we have to measure relative performance. I.e., if a mod. gives more power on a dyno, it'll give more power in the real world. What do you mean by bikes with airbox mods "losing some drive"? I'd guess that you've seen/experienced poor transient throttle response from bikes with full airbox mods. This would manifest itself as a stumble when the throttle is opened rapidly, especially from low engine speeds and is really more of a driveability issue than a power issue. It results in a rapid loss of port velocity when the throttle is opened quickly. A less restrictive airbox causes a larger initial drop in port velocity than a stock box. In fact, this phenomenon is what prompted Suzuki to incorporate the second set of butterflies found in the '00 GSXR 750 throttle bodies. By electronically controlling the butterflies they are able to provide the smooth transient throttle response required for roadracing by controling transient throttle port velocity. My understanding from reading the boards is that bikes with a full box mod make more power on the dyno and more speed at the dragstrip (real world power). It doesn't mean they could get around a road course faster, where predictable throttle response might allow faster laps than a more powerful engine with a "toggle switch" throttle. I'd suspect that most of this bad behavior could be compensated for with the correct FI remap.
Regarding your statement about modified boxes having lower velocity and hence lower flow, this is incorrect. In fact, the best that an airbox can do is completely stop the air, thus allowing it to reach its stagnation pressure, the highest pressure that can be achieved from an airstream flowing at a given velocity. Think of the airbox's role as being to raise the pressure of the available air to the engine (nature's turbo) and don't confuse inlet velocity in the airbox with port velocity, which is an entirely separate issue. I know this has gone long, but I've tried to be as brief as possible while still relaying the pertinent fluid dynamics involved.
Regarding your statement about modified boxes having lower velocity and hence lower flow, this is incorrect. In fact, the best that an airbox can do is completely stop the air, thus allowing it to reach its stagnation pressure, the highest pressure that can be achieved from an airstream flowing at a given velocity. Think of the airbox's role as being to raise the pressure of the available air to the engine (nature's turbo) and don't confuse inlet velocity in the airbox with port velocity, which is an entirely separate issue. I know this has gone long, but I've tried to be as brief as possible while still relaying the pertinent fluid dynamics involved.