OK, As a lot of you know ole' Rev has been under a lot of stress the last few months...Lilah hasn't been ridden in three weeks, hair turning grey, working 68 hours in three days (No BS). This leads to shall we say errors in Judgement, and rash decisions.
Below is my letter to Motorcyclist, I never really expected a human to read my initial letter, but still... I just tripped on my bobo and thought you all would get a kick out of it! Here we go!
As some of you know I rejoiced when Motorcyclist Magazine finally updated their "Hard Numbers" on the Busa, gone was the 10.34 1/4 time that had been there for 5 years. It was replaced by a pretty low ET of 9.88. So imagine my shock when flipping through my "March 2004" (Pay attention to this date) issue I see the numbers as 10.34 again. WHAT??? I freaked... And sent this letter to Motorcylist:
-----Original Message-----
From:***** Keith [mailto***************]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:00 AM
To: mcmail@primedia.com
Subject: Performance Data?
Hey Guys, I have been a subscriber for about 4 years, been reading Motorcyclist longer than that. Over all I have been pretty satisfied but there is one bone I have to pick with you.
Your Performance Data and it's "revisionist" data. What, did Kawasaki throw more money your direction over the last couple of months? I am referring specifically to the ZX12R and the Hayabusa performance numbers obtained by Keith Dennis in your "Head To Head" match up. You finally got a real drag racer on the Busa and Lo and behold his quarter mile time is a best of 9.88 for the Busa in stock form. I applauded your updating of the performance data in the back of the magazine to reflect the Busa's and the 12R's real potential. I mean 10.34 has been a real disservice to the Busa over the years. So I thought that finally a wrong had been righted, someone finally did the right thing... until this month.
It looks like Kawasaki has been paying more for you integrity and all of the sudden the performance data is back to the 10.34 while "Surprise" the 12R keeps it's best time... Pretty sorry folks.
I understand that you and your magazine are wholly owned by the big corporations, and you can never really speak your minds or give the whole story, hell even your subjective comments are glossed over. But to swap out hard numbers for money is pretty low and just not accurate.
To bad, now I cannot trust you either, Cycle Whored has been Honda's chimp for more years than I can remember, so clearly empty of real content that I haven't read it in years, now you go down the same path. You can keep moving to emulate the Brit Mags like you have been doing over the last year or so, but without their freedom to really express themselves and report actual results your going to remain a tool of the marketing and advertising departments...selling your integrity...
Sorry guys, I am just disappointed. [/QUOTE]
So as you can tell I was convinced someone was screwing up.
Well, imagine my shock when I get a response from Mr. Mitch Boehm, Motorcyclist's Editor and Chief. No Butt kissing, but he displayed some serious restraint, a real class act...
Here's his response: -----Original Message-----
From: Boehm, Mitch
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:54 PM
To: '*****, Keith'
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
Keith
I have the Feb and March issues right here in front of me, and both show the same times: 9.88 for the Busa and 9.92 for the 12R, just as they happened during the Keith Dennis story.
Better get your facts straight before you accuse us of pandering for ad dollars.
Backfires is gonna be good this month.
Boehm
[/QUOTE] and -----Original Message-----
From: Boehm, Mitch [mailto:**************]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 4:26 PM
To: *****, Keith
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
In stock condition, of course.
The numbers we got by lowering and re-gearing the bikes aren't appropriate for Hard Numbers.
[/QUOTE]
OK, once that hot feeling slowly left me I replied with: -----Original Message-----
From: ******, Keith [***********]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:49 PM
To: Boehm, Mitch
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
Let me get home, and check the issue date... Something's not right...If so You'll get to print my humbled apology....God forbid I dug out an old issue....
If I did I deserve it... You'll hear back from me on Tuesday.
Thanks for getting back to me, For Good or Evil...
[/QUOTE]
Well you all can probably see where this is headed.... Yeah, I go home and discover the sad truth for myself... Yup, I'm screwed!
Here is my reply....
RE: Performance Data?
Mmm, Smells like Crow !
Dear Mr. Boehm... (Note the penitent tone)
Well I went home, and sitting on my workbench in plain view were my most recent issues of Motorcyclist and Sportrider. However, much to my chagrin, my March issue isn't open... nope apparently I had delved into my Motorcyclist library and after finding the information I was looking for (V-max article January 2003) I had left it open and on top of the stack... Yup January, 2003 right on top, oh man... So yeah, WAY
wrong Hard Numbers. But could you kick one of the Web guys in the butt and have them update those hard numbers as well?
(I did check them to be sure)
So I am here to say I prefer my Crow Baked if you please, served with a big ole' slice of Humble pie. I apologize for being a dumb-ass, what else can I say?
To be honest I never really expected a human to read my original message, I would have chosen my words a little differently had I known. Let alone had I known you personally would read it, why? Well I ride a Busa obviously and I've been a Graphic Artist for 12 years. Working for Motorcyclist would be a dream job, Bikes, Art, and Photography together? Perfect job...
(Yeah, and didn't I just score huge points with the boss)
Oh and I will also be posting an apology to You and Motorcyclist Magazine at www.hayabusa.org I spend a lot of time there talking bikes, and I am pretty sure I slammed the Magazine there today as well.
Sorry for the unwarranted attack and for being so damn wordy. I should have at least said thanks for turning the Magazine around over the years, bringing it back from near extinction.
Thanks for you time and if you're ever in Tampa, dinner is on me.
Keith [/QUOTE]
He replied in a Gentleman's manner with Keith
No worries; I do stuff like that ALL THE TIME.
Thanks for being so into it all...we appreciate the energy and time you put
into the sport and our magazine. No poop.
Take care, and keep in touch.
No crow necessary.
Best,
Mitch
[/QUOTE]
So Class, what have we learned today?
1. Just because it's electronic mail doesn't mean it's not going to be read, and you don't know who may do the reading...
2. Check your facts, Look before you leap! Or you'll get your shoulder's pinned to the mat and deserve it...
3. Don't send email angry... if you wouldn't say it on the phone to them, don't write it... I.E. Don't be bobo!
4. Crow isn't all that bad really...I mean properly seasoned and not served cold....
Finally, In hindsight Motorcyclist magazine has always been kind to the Busa, their Head to Head test last year did a lot to maintain the Busa's reputation as a solid, reliable and fast bike. Remember how Suzuki showed up for the "Head to Head article? Yup, one Van, two guys, and an 03 LE Busa not yet fully broken in... Kawasaki brought a team of Engineers, a trailer, and a couple of spares...clearly the Suzuki camp wasn't concerned.
Oh and yeah, I'm an A**hole.... That's right me and Dennis Freakin Leary...
Sorry about that Mitch,
Rev
Below is my letter to Motorcyclist, I never really expected a human to read my initial letter, but still... I just tripped on my bobo and thought you all would get a kick out of it! Here we go!
As some of you know I rejoiced when Motorcyclist Magazine finally updated their "Hard Numbers" on the Busa, gone was the 10.34 1/4 time that had been there for 5 years. It was replaced by a pretty low ET of 9.88. So imagine my shock when flipping through my "March 2004" (Pay attention to this date) issue I see the numbers as 10.34 again. WHAT??? I freaked... And sent this letter to Motorcylist:
-----Original Message-----
From:***** Keith [mailto***************]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:00 AM
To: mcmail@primedia.com
Subject: Performance Data?
Hey Guys, I have been a subscriber for about 4 years, been reading Motorcyclist longer than that. Over all I have been pretty satisfied but there is one bone I have to pick with you.
Your Performance Data and it's "revisionist" data. What, did Kawasaki throw more money your direction over the last couple of months? I am referring specifically to the ZX12R and the Hayabusa performance numbers obtained by Keith Dennis in your "Head To Head" match up. You finally got a real drag racer on the Busa and Lo and behold his quarter mile time is a best of 9.88 for the Busa in stock form. I applauded your updating of the performance data in the back of the magazine to reflect the Busa's and the 12R's real potential. I mean 10.34 has been a real disservice to the Busa over the years. So I thought that finally a wrong had been righted, someone finally did the right thing... until this month.
It looks like Kawasaki has been paying more for you integrity and all of the sudden the performance data is back to the 10.34 while "Surprise" the 12R keeps it's best time... Pretty sorry folks.
I understand that you and your magazine are wholly owned by the big corporations, and you can never really speak your minds or give the whole story, hell even your subjective comments are glossed over. But to swap out hard numbers for money is pretty low and just not accurate.
To bad, now I cannot trust you either, Cycle Whored has been Honda's chimp for more years than I can remember, so clearly empty of real content that I haven't read it in years, now you go down the same path. You can keep moving to emulate the Brit Mags like you have been doing over the last year or so, but without their freedom to really express themselves and report actual results your going to remain a tool of the marketing and advertising departments...selling your integrity...
Sorry guys, I am just disappointed. [/QUOTE]
So as you can tell I was convinced someone was screwing up.
Well, imagine my shock when I get a response from Mr. Mitch Boehm, Motorcyclist's Editor and Chief. No Butt kissing, but he displayed some serious restraint, a real class act...
Here's his response: -----Original Message-----
From: Boehm, Mitch
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:54 PM
To: '*****, Keith'
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
Keith
I have the Feb and March issues right here in front of me, and both show the same times: 9.88 for the Busa and 9.92 for the 12R, just as they happened during the Keith Dennis story.
Better get your facts straight before you accuse us of pandering for ad dollars.
Backfires is gonna be good this month.
Boehm
[/QUOTE] and -----Original Message-----
From: Boehm, Mitch [mailto:**************]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 4:26 PM
To: *****, Keith
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
In stock condition, of course.
The numbers we got by lowering and re-gearing the bikes aren't appropriate for Hard Numbers.
[/QUOTE]
OK, once that hot feeling slowly left me I replied with: -----Original Message-----
From: ******, Keith [***********]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:49 PM
To: Boehm, Mitch
Subject: RE: Performance Data?
Let me get home, and check the issue date... Something's not right...If so You'll get to print my humbled apology....God forbid I dug out an old issue....
If I did I deserve it... You'll hear back from me on Tuesday.
Thanks for getting back to me, For Good or Evil...
[/QUOTE]
Well you all can probably see where this is headed.... Yeah, I go home and discover the sad truth for myself... Yup, I'm screwed!
Here is my reply....
RE: Performance Data?
Dear Mr. Boehm... (Note the penitent tone)
Well I went home, and sitting on my workbench in plain view were my most recent issues of Motorcyclist and Sportrider. However, much to my chagrin, my March issue isn't open... nope apparently I had delved into my Motorcyclist library and after finding the information I was looking for (V-max article January 2003) I had left it open and on top of the stack... Yup January, 2003 right on top, oh man... So yeah, WAY
wrong Hard Numbers. But could you kick one of the Web guys in the butt and have them update those hard numbers as well?
(I did check them to be sure)
So I am here to say I prefer my Crow Baked if you please, served with a big ole' slice of Humble pie. I apologize for being a dumb-ass, what else can I say?
To be honest I never really expected a human to read my original message, I would have chosen my words a little differently had I known. Let alone had I known you personally would read it, why? Well I ride a Busa obviously and I've been a Graphic Artist for 12 years. Working for Motorcyclist would be a dream job, Bikes, Art, and Photography together? Perfect job...
(Yeah, and didn't I just score huge points with the boss)
Oh and I will also be posting an apology to You and Motorcyclist Magazine at www.hayabusa.org I spend a lot of time there talking bikes, and I am pretty sure I slammed the Magazine there today as well.
Sorry for the unwarranted attack and for being so damn wordy. I should have at least said thanks for turning the Magazine around over the years, bringing it back from near extinction.
Thanks for you time and if you're ever in Tampa, dinner is on me.
Keith [/QUOTE]
He replied in a Gentleman's manner with Keith
No worries; I do stuff like that ALL THE TIME.
Thanks for being so into it all...we appreciate the energy and time you put
into the sport and our magazine. No poop.
Take care, and keep in touch.
No crow necessary.
Best,
Mitch
[/QUOTE]
So Class, what have we learned today?
1. Just because it's electronic mail doesn't mean it's not going to be read, and you don't know who may do the reading...
2. Check your facts, Look before you leap! Or you'll get your shoulder's pinned to the mat and deserve it...
3. Don't send email angry... if you wouldn't say it on the phone to them, don't write it... I.E. Don't be bobo!
4. Crow isn't all that bad really...I mean properly seasoned and not served cold....
Finally, In hindsight Motorcyclist magazine has always been kind to the Busa, their Head to Head test last year did a lot to maintain the Busa's reputation as a solid, reliable and fast bike. Remember how Suzuki showed up for the "Head to Head article? Yup, one Van, two guys, and an 03 LE Busa not yet fully broken in... Kawasaki brought a team of Engineers, a trailer, and a couple of spares...clearly the Suzuki camp wasn't concerned.
Oh and yeah, I'm an A**hole.... That's right me and Dennis Freakin Leary...
Sorry about that Mitch,
Rev