MV Agusta's '07

trip

Donating Member
Registered
There's fast, and then there's this
Susan Carpenter
October 18, 2006

SMOKIN'. That isn't just a reference to the F4-1000R's
top speed. It's what I wanted to be doing after riding
MV Agusta's '07 model sport bike. I don't even like
cigarettes, but there's something about a tach topping
out at 17,000 rpm that makes a girl want to light up.

The new F4 is freakishly fast. For 2007, MV Agusta
has eked an extra seven horsepower from its 16-valve
system and shaved 8 1/2 pounds from its wheels,
chassis and electrics. It now boasts a maximum,
out-of-the-box speed of 187 mph and horsepower
of 174 — a feat MV Agusta hopes to exploit if the
American Motorcyclist Assn. approves its entry into
superstock racing next year.


Until 1980, when the Italian manufacturer put the brakes
on motorcycle production, MV Agusta was the bike to
beat. It had claimed 75 world championships and 275
grand prix victories with Giacomo Agostini and other
legends at the controls. Almost 30 years later, the recently
reincarnated MV Agusta Motorcycles has set its sights on
reclaiming the brand's title as manufacturer of the
winningest bikes in the world with its newest F4-1000R.
During the 58th annual Bonneville National Speedweek in
August, the bike reached the highest recorded speed for
a production class 1000cc motorcycle: 187.726 mph.

That was on unmodified showroom stock — the same
model that's available at dealers and that will, at some
point, be scraped from the pavement on suicide corners
throughout the country. The warning sticker on the tank
doesn't say it, but I will: The F4-1000R is for experienced
riders only, preferably ones with a racing pedigree.


The F4-1000R's power band is like a stick of dynamite.
It's all fuse until about 5,000 rpm, when it completely
explodes. It wasn't until 10,000 rpm that I'd reached
maximum torque and 11,900 that I'd maxed out my
horsepower, which was tweaked for '07 with a
state-of-the-art, flashreprogrammable ECU fuel injection
system to control each cylinder individually instead of two
cylinders at a time.


As I rocketed toward Angeles Crest Highway on California
State Route 2, I attempted to test the gear ratio, but I
didn't get far. MV's specs said I'd be able to reach 78.5
mph in first gear at 13,000 rpm. I managed to hit 74 at
12,500 before the rev limiter flashed red. I clicked into
second, and cracked 100. The bike wasn't sweating, but I
was. As for hitting 129 mph in third, 153 in fourth, 174 in
fifth and 187 in sixth, I'll have to take MV Agusta's word
for it. Needless to say, I spent most of my time in first gear
as I turned Angeles Crest into an unofficial racetrack on a
recent weekday.


Lest the horsepower fool you, the F4 isn't a one-trick
pony. My friend Flicka was more than agile in canyon
country. In addition to reducing the diameter of the tubing
in the chassis trellis to save weight, MV Agusta improved
maneuverability by reducing the bike's rotating mass and
unsprung weight. It put the wheels on a diet for '07,
slimming each by 2 pounds with ultra-light,
forged-aluminum Brembos and spokes that narrow to the
diameter of a pencil.


The chrome-moly frame and 50-mm front fork — the
largest diameter fork of any production motorcycle — also
did their part, improving stability and control by increasing
rigidity. With antifriction coating smoothing movement and
anti-top-out springs helping on the rebound, the
top-of-the-line Marzocchi was especially helpful
accelerating out of corners. Rather than making me look
like a failed tryout for the StarBoyz stunt crew, it kept my
front end planted.


There are reasons the F4-1000R has been dubbed the
Ferrari of sport bikes — reasons that extend beyond a
shared Italian heritage, commitment to high style and
racing legacy. Ferrari engineers inspired the radial valve
design that's become a hallmark of the new MV Agusta.
Radial valves allow the engine to breathe in and out of
the combustion chamber more effectively, especially at
higher rpms. For the '07 F4-1000R, the longitudinal
distance between the valves was increased by a
seemingly minuscule 2 millimeters, but the increased
intake valve angle allows better tumbling of the gases
into the cylinder for a bigger bang of power.


The legendary sports car maker was also the inspiration
for the F4's exhaust. By ripping apart a Ferrari, designer
Massimo Tamburini came up with the idea to route the
F4's pipes under the seat, with a four-intotwo-into-one
system routed back into two into four. Tamburini first
routed the pipes under the seat on the other legendary
sport bike he designed — the Ducati 916 — but he's
tweaked it with the F4, not only for aesthetic appeal but
to help MV Agusta create its own immediately
recognizable and appealing exhaust tone, à la Ducati and
Harley-Davidson.


As I wrangled the F4, I attempted to keep my ear tuned to
the bass tones of the pipes. Yes, they were more
appealing than the high-rpm shriek of its Japanese
competitors, but MV Agusta would need to import more
than the 490 F4s it's bringing to the U.S. this year for
moto aficionados to pick up the subtle sonic differences
from the melee of competing pipes. That won't be
happening. Unlike Ducati, which has retained its exotic
and high-performance cred but lost its exclusivity, MV
plans to make one less bike than market demand to
retain its high-end allure.


MV Agusta's F4-1000R is the sort of bike that appeals to
snobs — scusi — men with refined tastes. The sort of men
who own espresso machines and wine cellars and stables
of other two-wheeled toys. The sort who are old enough
to drop $23,000 — cash — but young enough to take the
abuse of a riding position that rests their body weight on
the wrists and their chins on the ignition. The sort who
should, before buying, consider purchasing another item of
Italian descent, if only to aid in after-ride recovery: a
Jacuzzi.



2007 MV Agusta F4-1000R

Base price: $22,995

Engine: liquid-cooled, DOHC, four-stroke, 16-valve,across-the-frame four-cylinder

Displacement: 998 cc

Transmission: Six-speed

Bore and stroke: 76 mm x 55 mm

Maximum torque: 11.3 Kgm at 10,000

Horsepower: 174 at 11,900 rpm

Seat height: 31.87 inches

Dry weight: 423 pounds
 
oh I want one so bad...
wow.gif


someday maybe..
cool.gif
 
wow 172 hp from 17000 rpms? sweet. finally a legitimate "Busa killer"? no wait, probably still sucks to tour on. Oh well. Very good bike. Does it FINALLY beat out a GIX1K yet?
 
(WWJD @ Oct. 20 2006,10:39) wow 172 hp from 17000 rpms?  sweet.    finally a legitimate "Busa killer"?  no wait, probably still sucks to tour on.  Oh well.  Very good bike.  Does it FINALLY beat out a GIX1K yet?
Busa killer? Maybe.
Beat the Gix 1K? Prolly.
It is by far the prettiest bike I've ever seen, I would love to own one, but then there's that price tag.......
 
Beautiful bike but cannot outperform other liter bikes half its price tag as I have read time and time again.

For what it is and with a price tag like that, it should crush the competition................ it but it doesnt.

Absolutely beautiful bike though.
 
THAT IS THEE MOST GORGEOUS BIKE EVER MADE!!!

But when I was choosing my next bike. I could pick the MV. Or a Suzuki, add parts that would add up to that price tag. Then still have a bike, way more performance oriented.

Hope they do well.
Maybe one day...
 
The MV may have a slight upper hand on the Gixx. But I'd rather have a Gixx for half the price, mod it, do some engine work to meet Superbike Spec and be WAY more performance oriented than the MV. Or you could buy two Gixxers, 1 superstock spec and 1 superbike spec for the price of one Agusta.
 
Ok, I do think it looks nice and all, but why do you guys think it is SOOOOO SEXY? The lines are decnet enough but not amazing, the four pipes are cool but not amazing, everyone has a single sided swing arm, teh front rips off teh busa headlight.... is it because it has lots of fairing? You know, kinda continueous looking? What EXACTLY makes it LOOK cooler than the rest? The price tag?
 
(ksana @ Oct. 20 2006,18:06) THAT IS THEE MOST GORGEOUS BIKE EVER MADE!!!

But when I was choosing my next bike. I could pick the MV. Or a Suzuki, add parts that would add up to that price tag. Then still have a bike, way more performance oriented.

Hope they do well.
Maybe one day...
you have a point kasana but..

A suzuki will never have that much "class" no matter how much you throw at it.

wink.gif
 
(WWJD @ Oct. 20 2006,18:50) Ok, I do think it looks nice and all, but why do you guys think it is SOOOOO SEXY?  The lines are decnet enough but not amazing, the four pipes are cool but not amazing, everyone has a single sided swing arm, teh front rips off teh busa headlight.... is it because it has lots of fairing?  You know, kinda continueous looking?  What EXACTLY makes it LOOK cooler than the rest?  The price tag?
That's like asking men why some like Fat Women or Skinnie Women or tall Women or short Women or some well endowed or just small size
tounge.gif
.

It's just personal taste and NOTHING else
jump9.gif
 
How reliable are they? How do they handle? Why do they cost so much?

I think they cost so much so millionaire poser bikers can have something very few people own... to go hand in hand with their Ferrari. I'll take my busa over that thing any day... at any price.

And if I wanted a straight up sportbike, I would have bought a gixxer 1k. I also don't believe every single word that chick rider said in the article.
 
That MV Augusta F4-1000R may be a great bike until it breaks or needs tuning up/ servicing. But I guess if you can afford one of those motorcycles, you're in a different kind of world of money.

As for me, the Busa is the best bike based on brilliant engineering and quality. Parts are also plentiful.

MV Augusta may be brilliant, but I'll hold off on saying it is a quality bike without framing it in the proper context, because when it comes to quality, you have to hand it to the Japanese. They care about engineering quality in the overall sense of reliability and do business efficiently.  So when I see an expensive Italian Bike, I don't think luxury item, I think... business dinosaurs.  WE live in a world of mass production and factories, and I don't really care if it is Italian. I want the best in engineering, parts distribution, and performance. MV doesn't meet these real standards of modern days.

Unless the Italians can become more efficient in the business sense, they will ultimately end up like the British motorcycle industry. How many Italian bike companies have gone bankrupt or bought-out?
 
(PaNDeM1C @ Oct. 20 2006,14:03) I think they cost so much so millionaire poser bikers can have something very few people own... to go hand in hand with their Ferrari. I'll take my busa over that thing any day... at any price.
+1!!!!

correct answer indeed. couldn't agree more.
 
(gtrpimp76 @ Oct. 21 2006,07:05)
(PaNDeM1C @ Oct. 20 2006,14:03) I think they cost so much so millionaire poser bikers can have something very few people own... to go hand in hand with their Ferrari. I'll take my busa over that thing any day... at any price.
+1!!!!

correct answer indeed. couldn't agree more.
Interesting answer since they cost LESS than most Harleys that leave the Harley Dealerships  
wink.gif
 and I don't see many Ferraris in peoples garadge that own Harleys  
biggrin.gif
 
(DaCol. @ Oct. 21 2006,17:34) Interesting answer since they cost LESS than most Harleys that leave the Harley Dealerships  
wink.gif
 and I don't see many Ferraris in peoples garadge that own Harleys  
biggrin.gif
Call me crazy but for that price I'd take a Night-Rod Special and bump it to a S&S engine (comes out to about the same price as the MV) over the F4. Then again I'm completely illogical when it comes to the NR...*shrug*

Since the idea of the F4 as a Busa killer has been brought to the table I just have to get this out, I personally find the idea of X being a Y-killer to be stupid when X costs more than twice as much. Sure Bob's F4 is entirely capable of edging out Joe's Busa in a speed comparison (assuming equal rider experience), but what happens when you put the $12k price differential to use upgrading the Busa?
rock.gif


Then again, I'm supposed to be a lurking sponge, not an arguing one, so I'll be crawling back under my rock now.
smile.gif
 
Back
Top