teezy
Registered
I wanted to see the difference or gains from one to the next. Mainly to see the power vs cost difference. Im here in texas and have a good friend that lives in San Antonio who can swing by the VP RACING plant and pick it up for me so the price is cheaper... So I decided to buy a pail of MS109 and MR12. THe bike already had U4.4 in it. This is the break down on my bike.
COST
U4.4........... $74.00............. 5 gallons
Ms109......... $60.00.............. 5 gallons
Mr12.......... $110.00............. 5 gallons
DYNO NUMBERS
U4.4...................... 213whp 121wtq
Ms109................... 215whp 123wtq
Mr12...................... 216whp 124wtq
What I will say is that the tune from u4.4 too MR12 did not require any real adjustment. MS109 required alot. As far as power and torque the graph literally chased each other up the rpm band.
Sidenotes!!!
*MS109 smells bad!!! If you leave it sealed in your garage or in the bike it will stink up the place. Put it in a fringe if you have one in the garage.
*MR12 is just nasty!! Make sure after you run it you flush it out with something else. Everyone says it will ruin fuel parts. The throttle response on MR12 is worlds better then MS109 or U4.4 even if the dyno doesnt show the gains.
NOW E85 VS MR12 VS Q16
We dynoed one of the shop bikes today with MR12 in the tank. Its very humid today FYI... The results
MR12.............223 whp 132 wtq
E85................216 whp 127 wtq
Q16................217 whp 129 wtq
Sidenotes!!
*MR12 is 22.00 a gallon vs E85 at 3.16
*E85 also sign off early making peak power at 10,200 vs 10,500
On a customers bike we tested pump gas 87 vs u4.4
pump gas......187whp/104wtq
u4.4.............197whp/107wtq
KEEP IN MIND ALL THE BIKES ARE TUNED TOO THE FUELS!!!
I know that some of the fuels say pour in and go but we found that all the fuel required tuning it get the power out of the fuel.
COST
U4.4........... $74.00............. 5 gallons
Ms109......... $60.00.............. 5 gallons
Mr12.......... $110.00............. 5 gallons
DYNO NUMBERS
U4.4...................... 213whp 121wtq
Ms109................... 215whp 123wtq
Mr12...................... 216whp 124wtq
What I will say is that the tune from u4.4 too MR12 did not require any real adjustment. MS109 required alot. As far as power and torque the graph literally chased each other up the rpm band.
Sidenotes!!!
*MS109 smells bad!!! If you leave it sealed in your garage or in the bike it will stink up the place. Put it in a fringe if you have one in the garage.
*MR12 is just nasty!! Make sure after you run it you flush it out with something else. Everyone says it will ruin fuel parts. The throttle response on MR12 is worlds better then MS109 or U4.4 even if the dyno doesnt show the gains.
NOW E85 VS MR12 VS Q16
We dynoed one of the shop bikes today with MR12 in the tank. Its very humid today FYI... The results
MR12.............223 whp 132 wtq
E85................216 whp 127 wtq
Q16................217 whp 129 wtq
Sidenotes!!
*MR12 is 22.00 a gallon vs E85 at 3.16
*E85 also sign off early making peak power at 10,200 vs 10,500
On a customers bike we tested pump gas 87 vs u4.4
pump gas......187whp/104wtq
u4.4.............197whp/107wtq
KEEP IN MIND ALL THE BIKES ARE TUNED TOO THE FUELS!!!
I know that some of the fuels say pour in and go but we found that all the fuel required tuning it get the power out of the fuel.