<span style='color:crimson'>Well well well...
This is exactly the way I like these things to go.
Wag...
You have some excellent points from the perspective you are rooted in.
No doubt that many of your statements have a lot of reason.
But here goes.</span>
(Wag @ Oct. 10 2006,14:06)
(Projekt @ Oct. 10 2006,09:54)
Man, this topic is WAY complex. I'll give it my best shot.
Religion: Not free...
I find it intriguing that you and BusaWhipped have exactly the same idea but you believe that the other side is causing the problem! Very intriguing. Funny thing is, you're both right to a degree in that respect as well! Fact is, Christianity would like nothing more than to force everyone to be Christian. The Puritans were like that, the Crusaders were like that and there are plenty of Christian groups in the world today who are exactly like that. One group even wants to have their own Christian state or island. I don't recall which. The Mormons even now believe that Utah is "their" state.
Still, we have more religious freedom than any other country in the world. Except maybe Canada and U.K.
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response: It is always the other side and that is exactly the underlying point. You have excellent reading comprehension</span>
Economic: Not Free...[/Quote]
Selling someone the idea that they need material things is NOT taking away their freedom. Nobody twisted their arms behind their backs and made them give it up. No, they gave it up voluntarily and irresponsibly. Not the fault of capitalism. At least with capitalism, you have that degree of choice.
I think there are things which need fixing in our country but I believe in the theory of the Invisible Hand (Adam Smith?) which says that in a free market economy, everything works in the long run to the benefit of everyone.
We have more economic freedom than any other country in the world. Even Canada and U.K.
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response:Yes, well generally speaking I would agree that the good side of Capitalism is heavier than the bad side. But is depends on who looks at it and their economic parameters. You have the poor that desire more (me at the age of 6) and they are psychologically influenced using real psychological marketing techniques (believe it because that is what you will learn in any marketing book) to create a subliminal urge to go buy that. Simple example is the food and snacks character commercials before the movie at the cinema</span>
Philisophical: Not free...[/Quote]
The Dixie Chix expressed their opinions and other people expressed theirs. I don't see where the government stepped in and took anyone's freedom away. Freedom does not mean freedom from consequences of action, as the DC's found out the hard way.
As for the religious nuts who go overboard, many of them are militantly opposed to the U.S. The Mormons used to swea in secret inside their temples that they would avenge the blood of Joseph Smith on the U.S. government. (I may not have that exatly right.) Eventually, they took that part of their secret oaths out but the idea still pervades the religion to this day.
I don't want a militant group rising up at this point. The governmental problems need to be worked out but we are NOT at the point where we should (or even could) go about doing so with arms. Regardless of the beliefs of the Founding Fathers, may they rest in peace forever. If I have to pay my share of taxes, then by the fires of hell, so do they. Especially since they were given ample warnings and chose to respond with violence when they didn't have to do so.
We have more philosophical freedom than any other country in the world. Especially Canada and U.K.
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response: Not much to add there bedsides the fact that you have to consider that there are only a few corporations that own most of the Media broadcasters in this country. And depending on who they support, you'll get the message you get. Such as the defamation of the Dixie Chix.</span>
Sexual: Not Free... [/Quote]
I agree with you to a degree here. We're making progress, though.
This is one case where it might be better to live in Europe. I'd say the U.S. is about number 10 on the list, though. Sexual repression is still rampant in many countries. As with most freedoms, responsibility must be inherently tied to it or severe damage is caused to the society.
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response:Yes true... For example though; last year I went to Istanbul, Turkey and it just so happened that I found a place to stay in the Taksim district.. Gays, Lezzies, and Trannies everywhere around the plazas just having fun and cavorting with all types of people. Big strong men (okay that is kind of a stretch for Turkey) would walk right up to a she male and grab the rear and hug and cuddle. Never in Amerika, well maybe at a parade.</span>
Racial: Not Free... [/Quote]
Here too, we're getting better but we've a long way to go. I'm not as racist as I have been in my past. Living in California did a lot to make me realize that all people have good and bad, regardless of color.
I have hillbilly/redneck relatives in Missouri who are KKK members and the hardest core racists you could ever hope to meet. My mother's side of the family.
I've also met blacks, Asians, Indians, Europeans, etc. who are just as racist as they are. They would probably blame each other for their racist attitudes. Pathetic, really.
Of course, the flip side is true. There are awesome people of every race out there and when you meet them, you genuinely lose your perception of their race or color.
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response: Yes agreed</span>
Civil: Not Free...[/Quote]
Sounds like a lot of vitriol there, man. I'm not 100% sure where you're going with that one. Perhaps you could elaborate some more. It sounds like more of a stab from the economics corner than anything else.
Whattaya think?
<span style='color:crimson'>Projekt's Response: Exactly, that is what I intended to purvey, the capitalist mentality behind the imprisonment of these people and how that affects the legal system and the way it prosecutes specific variables. So it is an economic incursion onto the legislative side of civil liberties.</span>
--Wag--[/Quote]