This one hurt to read

I've been in several prisons throughout California and can honestly say, that sex offenders (overly broad description) are truly the most difficult issue facing our system. I would honestly feel safer for my family letting 7 of every 10 murderers out of prison than 1 out of 10 sex offenders.

I have not seen either way what medical research could tell us about the pros and cons of castration, will it help or create new problems?
 
I've heard that chemical castration or physical castration does very little to cure sex crimes or criminals.
 
Whart the article mentions that it is not a viable medical treatment.
 

Attachments

  • worms.bmp
    345.8 KB · Views: 232
problem could be solved with a good dose of lead moving at high speed... Low cost and very effective.....
 
True, but it would sure fit the eye for an eye argument just to teach them a lesson.
and probably prevent a few more cases.

I heard of a town in Montana that was having alot of robbery's and the mayor made it mandatory for every house to have a shot gun. The crime rate dropped to almost nothing.
 
True, but it would sure fit the eye for an eye argument just to teach them a lesson.

Ok but some of these guys are just individuals the flashed their junk. Other are mentally handicapped. I don't really think that meets the eye for an eye threshold.
 
Ok but some of these guys are just individuals the flashed their junk. Other are mentally handicapped. I don't really think that meets the eye for an eye threshold.

Okay.. Let's say that the offenders are given psych evals and are found to be sane. Let's also say that the committed bodily offenses and not simply flashing. Castrate then?
 
Okay.. Let's say that the offenders are given psych evals and are found to be sane. Let's also say that the committed bodily offenses and not simply flashing. Castrate then?

Are we also assuming that it is not an effective treatment and the castration is used as a form of punishment? If that is the case then I have a hard time supporting government mulitation. I mean why not give frontal lobotomys (sp?) to violent criminals?
 
and probably prevent a few more cases.

I heard of a town in Montana that was having alot of robbery's and the mayor made it mandatory for every house to have a shot gun. The crime rate dropped to almost nothing.

Could you find some info on that town for me please? very interested
 
I say give them the needle...it is way cheaper! A whole lot faster too.


By the way, why do they give lethal injections with sterile needles?? That is just an added expense. Just use the same needle over and over again.
 
But the real question is :banghead: :::::: Would Andrew Zimmer have them FRIED or Sauted :laugh:
 
In a lot of cases, I'm ok with attempting to try and "treat" them...

But the second time?

Cut the nads off and feed 'em to them.
 
With four kids you know what i say castrate them string them up:beerchug: stone them beat them torture......... you get my point then again vigilante justice strikes my chord!!
 
don't see much a difference violent sex offenders, pedophiles, murders lock em all up through away the key. no room you say???



:firing: then make some room
 
The really sick ones cannot help themselves and they will do it again and again no matter what. ONLY sure solution is to give em to the Dads....problem solved.
 
problem could be solved with a good dose of lead moving at high speed... Low cost and very effective.....
You took the words right out of my mouth. Lead to the head a very effective one time treatment.:firing:
 
Maybe the father in me is coming out--but--anyone who would take advantage of a child (boy or girl) and force them against their will --IS MENTALLY SICK! I don't care if they are only flashing their junk--it's wrong!! Is their a cure? I'm not smart enough to know the answer to that question. All I know is if they ever did that to my kids--I'm not sure what I'd do--but it wouldn't be pretty!
 
Back
Top