I'm wondering what use engine braking is with a slipper clutch.
With my limited technical knowledge I understand that slipper clutch is designed to disengage when encounters sudden back torque beyond a certain level to protect the engine. Meaning that ordinary engine braking is still available...
These are sensations I am very much looking forward to! Thanks.ENGINE BRAKING: the engine freewheels more on decel. If you backshift HARD ENOUGH the slipper clutch still does it’s thing. Try the different settings. YOU WILL FEEL IT! Like a two stroke has not a lot of engine braking. Do like that feeling? Then set to max and see what you think. I believe the timing and fuel are used to make this happen. STILL, backshift hard enough and we are back in slipper clutch territory….
My 99/00 unlimited absolutely had a slipper clutch. And it was hugely effective. It may have been early in the technology cycle, and it sure sounds like they've toned down the amount it slipped with improved versions. But there was no engine braking at all on mine, stock. I didn't like it.
Thank you, I have never heard of this distinction and can try looking it up on my own but if you would like to expand I would love to hear on the difference between the two. In my defense I don't think it's a distinction the Moto journalists from 20 years ago were clear about either.
* my gen 1 had synthetic oil in it, and if I remember correctly there was something about additives for car synthetic oil that you shouldn't use in a motorcycle. More recently I certainly used motorcycle specific synthetic oil, but it's possible the first times I put in synthetic, that slipper clutch got a little extra slippery (never had any problems under acceleration though). My gen 1 could not drag the rear tire no matter how hard you would try. Until I put in a solid clutch instead.
**hmm Neither Wikipedia nor the rest of the internet are too clear on the distinction either. Slipper clutch - Wikipedia.
Never looked into that, but drank the coolaid.Gen1 and 2 do Not have slipper clutches.
All I know, is when I downshift my Husqvarna aggressively, the rear is all over the place. I'm probably a bit more gentle, but I have never lost my rear on the Busa with a downshift. It probably depends on how aggressive you ride, although that doesn't make sense either, as the taper will cause more slip the more aggressive you are.I downshifted many a Gen1 and Gen2 aggressively at higher rpms...and slid the rear almost every time, not beyond my control...but Not a slipper clutch.
The later Gsxr1k's have had a slipper since 2005...and they are nothing like downshifting a Gen1 or 2 Busa...the Gsxr1k slippers actually work.
All I know, is when I downshift my Husqvarna aggressively, the rear is all over the place. I'm probably a bit more gentle, but I have never lost my rear on the Busa with a downshift. It probably depends on how aggressive you ride, although that doesn't make sense either, as the taper will cause more slip the more aggressive you are.
Are you perhaps on the back brake, when you downshift?
I use the clutch though when I shift, perhaps that is the difference?
What mechanism makes the clutch slip on the 1k bikes, how does it work differently from the Busa?No, If approaching a turn aggressively, I downshift before entering, then trail brake if I need to.
I have downshifted with and without using the clutch on Gen1 and 2 Busas, as well as the same with the '18 Gsxr1k with the awesome factory slipper and the auto blipper/QS up/down.
I havn't noticed any patterns in performance based on my input on the controls either.
I never saw Suzuki list the Gen2 Busa as having a slipper, only as back torque limiting.
But, if Suzuki wants to call it a slipper now...it wasn't/isn't a very good example.
Even the 05/06 Gsxr1k factory slipper is much better.
What mechanism makes the clutch slip on the 1k bikes, how does it work differently from the Busa?