Jay Mack,
I just went through the pros and cons comparing the two boxes. I went for the PC-II because it is more versatile, *if* you have access to a laptop PC, AND it can reset ignition timing (only above 4,000 rpm). The YOSH box cannot alter timing.
Being able to make timing changes would be useful for certain modifications, such as a turbo mod, higher C/R or with high octane racing fuel in the tank. As far as I know, the "consumer" available YOSH box is not able to address these specialized tuning requirements.
Neither product forces you to go to a dyno shop, but if not, they both impose a lot of guess work on the user. An EGA, which I think both OEMs sell as well, would help in tuning process as would an AFR analyzer. Both these type of accessories are likely to be expensive, so going to a Tuner is a viable alternative if he has such an analyzer.
The PC-II has a broader market and appeals to the computer literate, ie. "hackers". There are a bunch of maps floating around out there, being shared and constantly evolving for various bike configurations.
The problem, however, each bike is different and there is really no one ideal map common to all similarly modified bikes; not even two bone stock bikes are truly identical in terms of optimized tuning. And there are environmental factors to consider, ie. OAT, humidity, altitude, etc, in addition to warranty concerns.
The worst thing about the YOSH box, if you go the "service tech" route, is being dependent on a shop for minor changes the average computer hacker and bike owner may be capable of making himself. Personally, I'm getting a PC-II to aid in correcting an
off idle stumble condition, now that my bike has slip on exhaust cannisters, and yes, I am somewhat of a "hobbyist".
[This message has been edited by dsinned (edited 02 August 2000).]