andy and the r man
Registered
To answer your question about post count: Post count (except for Blanca Busa maybe ) is a quick way for other members to judge the time that a member has been on the board; there is a record from previous posts that help to ascertain the posting members patience, temperment and character. While a low post count does not mean the poster doesn't have those qualities, a larger post count does provide a history, and therefore lends more creditibility to the content of the post.
To use my other sport as an example: Would you say that a jumper with 3000 jumps over 20 years, may have more experience with issues than a novice with 100 jumps and 6 months in the sport? - absolutely. That long time jumper has seen (and survived) so much more that his post immediately carries more weight. Given this vender has been a member for a long time and a lot of members have had a good experience, trying to remain factual without the emotion will probably help others understand and bring about a speedier resolution.
Does not mean the lower post count does not have something credible to say, but does lend itself to greater scrutiny.
I see your point, but I'll still respectfully disagree. Jumping out of a plane is a lot different than writing posts on the subject. Same with anything. This may be bad to say, but the spelling and grammar in the original post shouted either English as a second language speaker, or drunk angry person. That latter of the 2 is what would deflate their credibility in my mind. Not the post count. We all have ways of ascertaining things and nobody can say what they choose is better than someone else's.