(BusaCruise @ Nov. 10 2006,00:03) Cap....I for one never questioned your or his integrity on this matter....but like you said...only one side was being explained.
As a community...I think we should be able to discuss and converse on such matters to the end where we all have diverse backgrounds and life experiences and may afford another member the idea or inspiration that might help resolve such scenarios.
By banning him and telling him to handle it on his own and then he can offer his "service" to us... instead of appealing to the mass resource of the forum participants....is much like having a hangnail and cutting of the toe and telling it to heal itself before it can rejoin the foot.
Having said that...he needs to make sure that he sticks with the facts and does everything on the up-and-up. I am not sure about the dual-citizenship comment...but that sounds shadey...right from the start.
Doug...don't let the muth pukes get your feathers ruffled...
I for one took the time to read their patents.... and it sounds to me like created a patent that could potentially cover anything from mirrored lava lamps to flashlights......and they even try to cover such inclusions with their statement:
the invention has been described in language more or less specific as to structural and methodical features. It is to be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific features shown and described, since the means herein disclosed comprise preferred forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims appropriately interpreted in accordance with the doctrine of equivalents.