Can you if I step up to the 32bit ecu?
Can you if I step up to the 32bit ecu?
DO3: you should know that I respect you and consider you an asset to this board. The exeption that I had with you is that you did not "make a simple suggestion" as you previously said. What you did was say that this guy should drop the PC and have it ecu tuned, which you stated is better. You commenting on what it is like to fly the space shuttle would have about the same relevance. To be fair, there are a lot of people on this board that have made similar comments without knowing first hand what they are talking about. I got tired of hearing that from people who simply have no clue. You just happened along. Don't stop offering your comments and expertise on what you do know, as I said, it is an asset - thanks.
When you say "base map" - if you are referring to fuel modifications, no I would not do a "base map". That is best done on a dyno, and any "bench" flash - like a canned Dynojet map, or someone else's custom map for that matter - would not do your bike justice. Fuel tuning is best done on a dyno. What I would do is remove gear limiters, the top speed limiter, modify and unify the ignition map to give you better throttle response from first through fourth, and for turbo applicatons, I would change the rev limit soft cut to a hard cut, modify the STP map, disable the ram air compensation, extend the IAP, etc. Many things that can and should be done depend on the specific application. I would do everything I could to de-restrict you ecu and modify any and all parameters that would complement your overall tune. Anyone looking to have this done by POWERHOUSE can request our "Ecu modification" form by email. Fill it out, send it in with your Ecu, and we will turn it around in one day and get it right back to you . . .
What would changing the rev limit from soft cut to a hard cut do? What does disabling the ram air compensation do?
Is this because it is just easier to do with the PC? I mean can’t the ECU editor create the same values? I’m not disagreeing, just trying to figure out the difference. I think I picked up on it just being harder to use, and maybe take longer, but maybe still COULD come up with the same tune eventually? Or is there just something that it can’t do no matter what?A powercommander custom mapped by the right person will ALWAYS generate a better FUEL map than Ecu Editor ever could. It is more about the software than anything else . . .
I realize I'm digging up a kinda old thread, but wanted to ask a couple of questions, mainly to POWERHOUSE, but any input is welcome.
first I know practically nothing, I’m just asking to learn.
Is this because it is just easier to do with the PC? I mean can’t the ECU editor create the same values? I’m not disagreeing, just trying to figure out the difference. I think I picked up on it just being harder to use, and maybe take longer, but maybe still COULD come up with the same tune eventually? Or is there just something that it can’t do no matter what?
What do you think about the autotune on the ecu editor? (wondering if this might fill the gap in the difficulty of getting the correct map in there…) I imagine probably not as good as a good custom tuner and a dyno, but how far off is it? sounds like it could be decent.
I have first gen ecu that was tuned by a tuner that the previous owner had done on a dyno (also tuned for a small nitrous shot). Is there a way to see what that tune is? (a starting point?) can other values be looked at?(like soft/vs hard cut and so on…)
Not that I’m planning on changing it…
I assume that nitrous would have the same ill effects as the turbo bikes with the soft cut, can I tell if I have a soft vs hard cut now? (it may already be hard cut)
And lastly, can other things be programmed into the ECU without messing with the MAP? (like I was thinking about lowering the ECU controlled shift light rpm a bit)