I just took a quick look at the dyno charts.
I do have a couple points of interest:
We also use a dynojet 150. Did you happen to note the humidity? We have seen 5-7 hp differences in a change from 70% to 90%.
The engine can not burn the extra water in the air. The only reason that I bring this up is because the curves are nearly IDENTICAL.. EVERYWHERE.. this is very strange. It resembles a chart switching to oxiginated fuel! I have also noticed this type of curve with a difference of 15 psi in the rear tire.
My bigest concern is with the .4" hg difference in barometric pressure.I know our 150 does not compensate for this as consistantly as a model 200 with the "weather cube".
These variables are difficult to consistantly to track. But,if the operator
did a meticulous job, there is little doubt that the Akrapovic wins this dyno battle hands down!
Now is when I would proceed to the track and test/prove the results. A true gain of this caliber would be worth @ 1.5 Mph increase in 1/4 mile trap speed at the drag strip and nearly 1 tenth improvement in et.
This brings me to a bike that we just installed a Hindle on at the end of last season. My buddy Tony Wiford rode his own bike. With no mapping or airbox mods (there is a slight stumble a @2500 rpm) and the standard stuff(16t front,links,strap,clutch mod) he ran a 9.52 @ 148 mph. I belive the bike made 158 peak on our dyno 150.
Food for thought,
Brock
ps Keep up the info, WE all learn!!!