GNBRETT
Registered
yea I'm aware the design is not new. it works best with an AMS 1000/2000 which is the primary reason ppl buy which is why Seb bought the rights to it so he cud incorporate his AMS into it. again, Seb designed it to work with the AMS period. not off the plenum.
u also seem to run ur WG off manifold pressure vs. Co2. sure it can be done but its not the most efficient and useful way of doing it. u primarily do that cause u don't think a boost controller is useful on the street and therefore run a very large spring. I disagree and think a BC is extremely useful on the street and therefore run a smaller spring so I can control boost and keep the front end down and or not blow the tires off.
and not to mention if ur someone who likes to street ride their bike AND take it to the track the large spring becomes useless cause u now can't use ur BC to control boost off the line unless u think running 12-15 lbs of boost with watever spring ur running off the line is wise?
so yes there are many ways to set things up to run and just cause u can set one up a particular way doesn't mean you shud.
and yea the part melted cause it was an inferior just like it has on numerous PST bikes which is why many of them don't run Wossner rods anymore. nothing went lean, fuel pump was fine and it was on C16 at 17 lbs of boost with proper A/F ratio. so tune wise it was spot on. reliability wise it failed period. u can speculate all u want but there is no reason a rod shud fail at 17 lbs of Boost on C16 wen everything else was spot on. everything else was collateral damage.
u also seem to run ur WG off manifold pressure vs. Co2. sure it can be done but its not the most efficient and useful way of doing it. u primarily do that cause u don't think a boost controller is useful on the street and therefore run a very large spring. I disagree and think a BC is extremely useful on the street and therefore run a smaller spring so I can control boost and keep the front end down and or not blow the tires off.
and not to mention if ur someone who likes to street ride their bike AND take it to the track the large spring becomes useless cause u now can't use ur BC to control boost off the line unless u think running 12-15 lbs of boost with watever spring ur running off the line is wise?
so yes there are many ways to set things up to run and just cause u can set one up a particular way doesn't mean you shud.
and yea the part melted cause it was an inferior just like it has on numerous PST bikes which is why many of them don't run Wossner rods anymore. nothing went lean, fuel pump was fine and it was on C16 at 17 lbs of boost with proper A/F ratio. so tune wise it was spot on. reliability wise it failed period. u can speculate all u want but there is no reason a rod shud fail at 17 lbs of Boost on C16 wen everything else was spot on. everything else was collateral damage.
Brett,
The NLR boost compensated clutch is the exact same thing as the Anderson boost compensated clutches. NLR bought the rights to it. That clutch was on the market BEFORE the AMS1000 was even on the market. Not sure how you think that it was designed for use with the boost controller. We've used and sold many NLR boost clutches on bikes that didn't use a controller to run it. 1 psi of boost adds something crazy like 600 pounds of pressure plate force added to the clutch, on top of the static spring pressure. The concept is simple, the more boost, the mute pressure plate pressure.
And far as parts melting like you talked about, parts don't melt because of being inferior. Parts melt because of bad tunes, inadequate octane for boost, or a fuel pump, or injector failure causing to go lean. Now if you said your ring lands cracked, or broke a rod, then yeah I'd stay away from wossner.