way to make someone feel welcome here.
Don't pay any attention to that canidream. It's a good question and you deserve a good response. I personally think some people just don't like to see anyone else buying a hayabusa for some silly and vain reasons that I won't go into here.
My thought on you getting one is definitely do it. You can kill yourself on any bike from a rm250 to a hayabusa. You know your limits and what you are and are not capable of. You should do what your heart tells you to do. One either falls in love at first sight at the busa or does not. If you have, then buy one as soon as you are able. Life is too short to deny yourself of dreams. Live the dream I say.
Welcome to the board !!
Kerb: With you 100% on this one. I also have seen this "don't buy this bike it's not for you, start smaller" theory on many other forums. I'm sure a lot of people think they are looking out for others best interests, but I do get the distinct underlying message in some of the replys that people, for some strange reason, project a certain "elitist" attitude about bikes like the Busa.
There is NO definite proof that starting out with a smaller bike and "working up" is a benefit to the rider. First off, nobody can agree on what size "smaller" bike it should be. Second, a smaller bike is going to have VERY different characteristics from a Busa or any other Sportbike. And even if the person rode that smaller bike for 10 years, there's nothing written in stone that says he won't get on the Busa and wreck it the first day. Especially if he is used to a bike that is much less powerful and much more manuverable than a Busa.
To me the MATURITY (not age, but the way a person handles himself) is the most important thing when considering a bike like the Busa or any other bike with similar capabilities.
I have seen mature young riders and idiot older riders.
As long as you realize the capabilities of the bike you are riding, and the limitations of the skill you have AS a rider, I think a Busa would be a fine first bike.
just my opinion
Dep
There are a number of fallacies and outright errors in several of these post.
1) "You can kill yourself just as easy on an RM250 as a Busa."
Someone can "kill themselves' with a butter-knife. The point is that a smaller, lighter and less powerful bike is easier to learn riding fundamentals with. Period. Ask top-level racers and riding instructors.
2) "You know your limits and what you are and are not capable of."
Precisely how does someone know their limits prior to practicing any activity? This is a key point right here. New riders don't.
3) "There is NO definite proof that starting out with a smaller bike and "working up" is a benefit to the rider."
Besides the fact that this flies in the fact of common sense, there have been a number studies done world-wide over the years. Do a web-search for "NHTSA Summary Report Number DOT HS 808 569". Read the whole thing. Also, there are studies that have been done in Europe that have lead to the formation of many European country's graduated license programs.
4) "Second, a smaller bike is going to have VERY different characteristics from a Busa or any other Sportbike." Precisely the point. However, they will still turn and brake like almost any other motorcycle. Again, it is the very fact that smaller bikes (like the Ninja 250, CR500, SV650 and others) are more forgiving and easier to excert control over that makes them better choices, just as a Cessana Skyhawk is a logical first step to learning how to fly a Citation.
5) "And even if the person rode that smaller bike for 10 years, there's nothing written in stone that says he won't get on the Busa and wreck it the first day." Of course not. Who said they couldn't? Nobody is saying that "something bad is gonna happen if you by a Busa first." No, the message is "your going to be safer and ultimately enjoy the bike more if you start on a smaller bike'.
6) "To me the MATURITY (not age, but the way a person handles himself) is the most important thing when considering a bike like the Busa or any other bike with similar capabilities.
"
Maturity is great, but what does this have to do with ability? "Maturity"-based arguments imply the entire risk of big-bore sport-bikes comes from the throttle, and if you don't open the throttle, you'll be OK. That's nonsense. The risk is from being able to avoid accidents, regardless of their root cause. Speed is only one factor amongst many.
7) "As long as you realize the capabilities of the bike you are riding, and the limitations of the skill you have AS a rider, I think a Busa would be a fine first bike." Again, how does anyone measure the capabilties of modern big-bore sport-bikes WITHOUT a frame of reference? If this theory were correct, then we should all learn to drive in Vipers. Pilots would learn to fly in F-14s. Don't you see anything fundamentaly flawed in that argument?
Please note that I am not an "elitist". In over twenty-four years of riding, I have seen more people leave the sport because they start riding a "scarry" bike than I have seen for accident injuries. The number is literally in the hundreds. I can't count the number of people that I saw, in a brief stint as an riding instructor, borrow smaller bikes for classes.
I want people to buy Hayabusas and ZX-12Rs, because I will then have more people to ride with. Also, the bikes will continue to improve as more people buy them. This means that people have to feel confident, have fun and not loose control of the damned things.
Make no mistake: I want people to ride these kind of bikes. I am not trying to make the person that asked the question "feel bad", or even not get a big-bore sport-bike. I am simply suggesting to them to learn how in a way that will allow them to have the most confidence and enjoyment.
Mike