Helmet use study

Dino

VERITAS - AEQUITAS
Donating Member
Registered
This may seem like a blinding flash of the obvious to most of us because we seem to all understand the importance of helmet use but what I saw as hitting home to the general public was: "Total acute care hospital charges stemming from motorcycle-related head injuries increased 132 percent in the two years following repeal compared to 69 percent for non-head injuries. "
Thoughts?


Major Increase in Head Injuries Noted After Repeal of Pennsylvania’s Motorcycle Helmet Law


Pittsburgh, June 12, 2008 -- Pennsylvania motorcyclists suffered large increases in head injury deaths and hospitalizations in the two years following the repeal of its motorcycle helmet law, according to a University of Pittsburgh study to be published in the August issue of the American Journal of Public Health, available online June 12. Even after accounting for increases in motorcycle registrations that occurred during this period, study authors noted a 32 percent increase in head injury deaths and a 42 percent increase in head injury-related hospitalizations, raising concerns about motorcyclists’ safety and the impact of this trend on health care costs.

Pennsylvania repealed its universal motorcycle helmet law in 2003. Under the current law, only motorcyclists under 21 and riders with less than two years experience who have not taken a safety course are required to wear helmets.

Study authors analyzed data from Pennsylvania’s departments of Health and Transportation during the years 2001-2002 and 2004-2005. They found helmet use by motorcyclists involved in reported crashes decreased from 82 percent to 58 percent in the two years after repeal. The authors also looked at data from head injury and non-head injury deaths to determine specifically how many deaths were caused by not wearing helmets. They found the registration-adjusted head injury death rate increased by 32 percent, whereas the non-head injury death rate did not change.

“Our study shows that since the repeal of Pennsylvania’s motorcycle helmet law, helmet use has gone down, while head injuries from motorcycle crashes have gone up, even after increased motorcycle registration,” said Kristen Mertz, MD, MPH, study lead author and assistant professor, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. “We looked at both head injuries and non-head injuries to get a clearer picture of the impact of the helmet law repeal. The relatively large increase in head injury deaths and hospitalizations after the repeal suggests that the law was protecting riders.”

The study authors looked at hospitalizations per 10,000 registrations from motorcycle crashes by examining discharge data compiled from all acute care hospitals in the state. They found an increase of 42 percent in the head injury hospitalization rate and a 2 percent increase in the non-head injury hospitalization rate. The number of head-injured, hospitalized motorcyclists requiring further care at facilities specializing in rehabilitation and long-term care increased 87 percent after the repeal, and increased 16 percent for non-head injured motorcyclists.

Total acute care hospital charges stemming from motorcycle-related head injuries increased 132 percent in the two years following repeal compared to 69 percent for non-head injuries.

“Our findings strengthen the argument for more comprehensive helmet laws that help protect riders and lower the cost of health care,” said Hank Weiss, PhD, MPH, study co-author and associate professor, Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Injury Research and Control, University of Pittsburgh. “Serious head injuries, causing anything from short-term memory loss, inability to concentrate to coma and death, can severely impact quality of life and affect not just those injured, but their families as well. Until a universal helmet law is reinstated, Pennsylvania needs effective voluntary strategies to increase helmet use.”

Motorcycle helmet laws have weakened nationwide since 1975, when the federal government stopped withholding highway money from states without such regulations. Only 20 states now have laws that require all riders to wear helmets.

The study was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.


http://www.neurosurgery.pitt.edu/news/2008/head_injuries.html
 
Last edited:
I want get on mine without my helmet on. You have only one head, better keep it.:thumbsup:
 
And they make great lamps after you crash.. I will be posting pics of mine soon..

I wear mine pretty much all the time, cant say much for the other gear.
 
And there there is ABATE: (and all 3 halves of their membership)

First is ABATES public statement that helmets are in deed a great idea to wear.. (ok then)

second group is adamantly against helmet laws for the issue of "govt control over their god given right to do as they damn well please"

The third side argues that helmets are inherently dangerous for a number of insanely stupid reasons..


I think both sides are morons.... :whistle:
 
I never ride without a lid. But if we are going down the road of forcing people to be safer, just ban motorcycles.

I do not like any idea that starts with the statement "This is for your own good..."

Washington State is running ads for speed related crashes and that is the reason for increase patrols and tickets. Their justification is that 1/3 of all fatal accidents have a "speed" related component.

So that mean 2/3 of fatal accidents do not involve speed. 621 fatal crashes in 2006, this leaves 207ish that had a speed component. Not that speed was the culprit, it was just present. I do not know what my point is other than I see a lot of fear based reasoning to meddle in peoples lives. Washington State now forces all people to wear seatbelts. Now they can pull you over and give you a ticket if you are not wearing one. The public is forced to wear seatbelts, but no form of public transportation has a seatbelt. Not even school buses.

Here are some stats for Washington in 2007:

Murder: 177
Rape : 2,556
Assault:1 2,658
robbery: 6,018
Violent crimes: 21,409

Really?!? We need adds on television for speeders?!???

Helmets, seatbelts, lead in motorcycles...

I see people agreeing to anything if someone can say "It saves lives..." It doesn't even have to be true.

Society has lost it's mind. We need to start a new political party based on common sense. Problem is I do not think we could find enough people with it anymore.

sorry for the rant.
 
Lets just set good examples and wear our stuff, don't want more laws to protect us from ourselves. Look at nature, how safe is it to have a lion eat your deer but :whistle: Gee, I bet mandatory helmets in cars would save some problems, say air bag scratches. Perhaps helmets, leathers , hans device, fire suit, and ...Pillows on the seats... Some riders its just all about the freedom I guess, cowboys or whatever just not so cool to be safe & all, and don't want to be told to play safe. I thought more peeps would hang with the gear given the freedom to choose, but allot of "lone eagles" seem to have more than a smidge of susceptability to peer pressure conformity influences???.
 
Last edited:
i think that most people find gear is to much $$$ i think they should reduce the price of gear, it's like expensive insurance, that's why i think alot of people drive without. :dunno:
 
I never ride without a lid. But if we are going down the road of forcing people to be safer, just ban motorcycles.

I do not like any idea that starts with the statement "This is for your own good..."

Washington State is running ads for speed related crashes and that is the reason for increase patrols and tickets. Their justification is that 1/3 of all fatal accidents have a "speed" related component.

So that mean 2/3 of fatal accidents do not involve speed. 621 fatal crashes in 2006, this leaves 207ish that had a speed component. Not that speed was the culprit, it was just present. I do not know what my point is other than I see a lot of fear based reasoning to meddle in peoples lives. Washington State now forces all people to wear seatbelts. Now they can pull you over and give you a ticket if you are not wearing one. The public is forced to wear seatbelts, but no form of public transportation has a seatbelt. Not even school buses.

Here are some stats for Washington in 2007:

Murder: 177
Rape : 2,556
Assault:1 2,658
robbery: 6,018
Violent crimes: 21,409


Really?!? We need adds on television for speeders?!???

Helmets, seatbelts, lead in motorcycles...

I see people agreeing to anything if someone can say "It saves lives..." It doesn't even have to be true.

Society has lost it's mind. We need to start a new political party based on common sense. Problem is I do not think we could find enough people with it anymore.

sorry for the rant.

EXCELLENT POINTS.

You forgot that the crime you mentioned when stopped don't make money for the state. At the end of the day it is much easier to sit on the side of the road and ticket speeders than actually fight real crime. This is not about bashing cops but about addressing a problem with the system the cops on the street are just doing what they are told so I don't blame them or want to sound like I am bashing them at all. I would actually bet that that good ones would rather be out trying to fight crime.

Back to the article when average people see that they are paying more because or someone else's choice NOT to wear a helmet that's will be the catalyst for change.

"Total acute care hospital charges stemming from motorcycle-related head injuries increased 132 percent in the two years following repeal compared to 69 percent for non-head injuries. " - Who is paying?
 
Last edited:
And there there is ABATE: (and all 3 halves of their membership)

First is ABATES public statement that helmets are in deed a great idea to wear.. (ok then)

second group is adamantly against helmet laws for the issue of "govt control over their god given right to do as they damn well please"

The third side argues that helmets are inherently dangerous for a number of insanely stupid reasons..


I think both sides are morons.... :whistle:

I think people seeing ABATE as only a helmet law group is completely narrow minded. When was the last time you talked to your legislator about any of the issues faced by motorcyclist?
 
I wear my lid, but because I want to, pretty sure the goverment has bigger problems than me and my head. They already have to many:rulez:
 
EXCELLENT POINTS.

You forgot that the crime you mentioned when stopped don't make money for the state. At the end of the day it is much easier to sit on the side of the road and ticket speeders than actually fight real crime. This is not about bashing cops but about addressing a problem with the system the cops on the street are just doing what they are told so I don't blame them or want to sound like I am bashing them at all. I would actually bet that that good ones would rather be out trying to fight crime.

Back to the article when average people see that they are paying more because or someone else's choice NOT to wear a helmet that's will be the catalyst for change.

"Total acute care hospital charges stemming from motorcycle-related head injuries increased 132 percent in the two years following repeal compared to 69 percent for non-head injuries. " - Who is paying?


Yeah, I didn't want to turn it into the cashgh caow debate for the state. Even though Washington state traffic fines go directlt to schools and roads. Guess which 2 things had their budgets cut last year? Just after that, all the new ways to hand out tickets came out. Go figure. It is not cop bashing. The politicians make the laws the cop follow orders.

And to the point of politicians should have better things to do...You are right, except any time a politician can say he/she is "saving a life" they grab on to that topic like Micheal Jackson on a five year old white boy. ???

I think I am seriously going to try and run for office. I am tired of the BS and really need to put my money where my mouth is.
 
Back
Top