HOW CAN YOU LIVE.....

1718389729423.png

Credit Card Money GIF by Pudgy Penguins
 
Charts can and typically are, very misleading. This one above points to political reasons as being the driver, but nothing could be further from the truth. The simple truth is that when you create vast new volumes of money and send it out into the community it generates a bidding war for goods and services, for stocks, for houses. Inflating (growing) the money supply in public hands creates general price inflation. The cause in the chart above? Covid stimulus money.

Mar 11, 2022 · Stimulus bills approved by Congress beginning in 2020 unleashed the largest flood of federal money into the United States economy in recorded history. Roughly $5 trillion went to households, … ww.investopedia.com/government-stimulus-efforts-to-fight-the-covid-19-crisis-4799723

Why focus the attention on a political party then, on a particular President? To keep the people ignorant of course, to make them believe the problem is in the party they elected. Vote B next time if you want change. If they knew the truth they might question the wisdom in locking down the economy for 6~12 months to fight a flu, but it's far too late for any action on that front anyway, the entire system is captured. Price Inflation lags monetary inflation, but I think it's pretty much through the economy now.

Government creates vast amounts of new money all the time, through bond issuances, but this money typically doesn't flow down into the general public. Like all the money allocated to the ukrainian conflict, most of that went to the likes of Raytheon and Boeing and the other arms dealers. The profits of the sales into the pockets of vastly wealthy people in other words. It's only when the money goes to the Peon that we see things like food inflation. Like housing prices growing rapidly when trillions are created and people are allowed to bid for investment homes, rentals. So it's all a bidding war, even in the supermarket. People with more money buying more of the available food basically. It happens on an international level the same way. If the people in a country are poor they won't get all the rice or wheat etc that they want because richer nations can bid higher for it.

But back to the chart above we see it's all Biden's fault. You are responsible in other words, it was Your choice that brought this on, You voted wrong and now you're reaping the consequences. It's a very clever system, all the agro of a nation focused on a nobody that will soon retire into luxury and be forgotten a month after leaving office. Like Bush is forgotten, Like Clinton, Like Obama. Meanwhile, the rich grow richer.
 
Last edited:
Charts can and typically are, very misleading. This one above points to political reasons as being the driver, but nothing could be further from the truth. The simple truth is that when you create vast new volumes of money and send it out into the community it generates a bidding war for goods and services, for stocks, for houses. Inflating (growing) the money supply in public hands creates general price inflation. The cause in the chart above? Covid stimulus money.



Why focus the attention on a political party then, on a particular President? To keep the people ignorant of course, to make them believe the problem is in the party they elected. Vote B next time if you want change. If they knew the truth they might question the wisdom in locking down the economy for 6~12 months to fight a flu, but it's far too late for any action on that front anyway, the entire system is captured. Price Inflation lags monetary inflation, but I think it's pretty much through the economy now.

Government creates vast amounts of new money all the time, through bond issuances, but this money typically doesn't flow down into the general public. Like all the money allocated to the ukrainian conflict, most of that went to the likes of Raytheon and Boeing and the other arms dealers. The profits of the sales into the pockets of vastly wealthy people in other words. It's only when the money goes to the Peon that we see things like food inflation. Like housing prices growing rapidly when trillions are created and people are allowed to bid for investment homes, rentals. So it's all a bidding war, even in the supermarket. People with more money buying more of the available food basically. It happens on an international level the same way. If the people in a country are poor they won't get all the rice or wheat etc that they want because richer nations can bid higher for it.

But back to the chart above we see it's all Biden's fault. You are responsible in other words, it was Your choice that brought this on, You voted wrong and now you're reaping the consequences. It's a very clever system, all the agro of a nation focused on a nobody that will soon retire into luxury and be forgotten a month after leaving office. Like Bush is forgotten, Like Clinton, Like Obama. Meanwhile, the rich grow richer.
Good post until the end. This country has not forgotten Clinton, the most economically sound thinker in the White House in a century, or Obama, the most respectfully presidencial presence in a long time, since Reagan perhaps. It’s the memory of them that makes Trump/Biden look like like the plot of a bad movie.
 
Good post until the end. This country has not forgotten Clinton, the most economically sound thinker in the White House in a century, or Obama, the most respectfully presidencial presence in a long time, since Reagan perhaps. It’s the memory of them that makes Trump/Biden look like like the plot of a bad movie.
I tend not to look at the personalities myself, a respectful image is just that, an image. We had a P.M. down here, Howard, everyone loved him because when all the politicians were fighting like cats in the broadcast videos of the House he was acting like a Statesman. Never raised his voice, never engaged in petty slandering. He won by a landslide and then used that 'mandate' to enact a GST tax of 10% across the board, then oversaw strict gun control measures after the Port Arthur massacre, did nothing to rein in the banks that created a massive housing bubble that distorted the nation.

When I look back now I see he actually had nothing to do with any of those disastrous policies, he was just following orders from a superordinate body whose origins I can only guess at but the evidence was that the same policies basically were simultaneously enacted across many OECD nations at the same time. VAT tax in the UK etc, Housing bubbles across the entire western block, stricter gun control measures in the same affiliated nations and privatization (the sell off) of government assets. He survived a few terms but in the end was tossed out and even lost his seat, one he had held for eternity. He was roundly hated.

The choice you now have, if you choose the engage in it, is of course laughable, on that we definitely agree Red. I really makes me wonder what's going on behind the scenes? I mean those two political parties are not run by idiots, and they could have elevated anyone to the position of prospective President if they has wanted. I know Trump is an outlier and he almost proves the idea that "Anyone" can become president, but this late in the game it all seems to pat for me. Like when a corporation hires a new CEO and that guy proceeds to run the company into the ground, only to retire and be appointed as CEO of another important Corp. He was a wrecking ball and that was what he was employed as. Mission accomplished, here's your reward.

Why would anyone want to wreck a corp? I can think of lots of reasons, perhaps it's going down anyway due to new competition or innovations in the market and the major stake holders want to short it and have it collapse fast so they can get out with a profit? Short-selling stock should be outlawed, but it isn't. Similarly there might be a massive market and debt collapse on the near horizon and the old established political families don't want to take the blame? Sort of like when Hoover was elevated and elected as president. He oversaw the collapse of 1929 and was blamed for all the problems of the depression but he was a no-body, a civil servant chosen as the party favorite. After the collapse the established political families, think Clintons, Bushes etc can step in and take control. It sounds far fetched I know, it sounds conspiratorial, but politics isn't exactly an honest game is it.
 
Last edited:
I tend not to look at the personalities myself, a respectful image is just that, an image. We had a P.M. down here, Howard, everyone loved him because when all the politicians were fighting like cats in the broadcast videos of the House he was acting like a Statesman. Never raised his voice, never engaged in petty slandering. He won by a landslide and then used that 'mandate' to enact a GST tax of 10% across the board, then oversaw strict gun control measures after the Port Arthur massacre, did nothing to rein in the banks that created a massive housing bubble that distorted the nation.

When I look back now I see he actually had nothing to do with any of those disastrous policies, he was just following orders from a superordinate body whose origins I can only guess at but the evidence was that the same policies basically were simultaneously enacted across many OECD nations at the same time. VAT tax in the UK etc, Housing bubbles across the entire western block, stricter gun control measures in the same affiliated nations and privatization (the sell off) of government assets. He survived a few terms but in the end was tossed out and even lost his seat, one he had held for eternity. He was roundly hated.

The choice you now have, if you choose the engage in it, is of course laughable, on that we definitely agree Red. I really makes me wonder what's going on behind the scenes? I mean those two political parties are not run by idiots, and they could have elevated anyone to the position of prospective President if they has wanted. I know Trump is an outlier and he almost proves the idea that "Anyone" can become president, but this late in the game it all seems to pat for me. Like when a corporation hires a new CEO and that guy proceeds to run the company into the ground, only to retire and be appointed as CEO of another important Corp. He was a wrecking ball and that was what he was employed as. Mission accomplished, here's your reward.

Why would anyone want to wreck a corp? I can think of lots of reasons, perhaps it's going down anyway due to new competition or innovations in the market and the major stake holders want to short it and have it collapse fast so they can get out with a profit? Short-selling stock should be outlawed, but it isn't. Similarly there might be a massive market and debt collapse on the near horizon and the old established political families don't want to take the blame? Sort of like when Hoover was elevated and elected as president. He oversaw the collapse of 1929 and was blamed for all the problems of the depression but he was a no-body, a civil servant chosen as the party favorite. After the collapse the established political families, think Clintons, Bushes etc can step in and take control. It sounds far fetched I know, it sounds conspiratorial, but politics isn't exactly an honest game is it.
You present a sound theory but I choose to believe, maybe want to, that all leaders are not bought. Otherwise, what the hell are we doing here?
Regardless this country is in for another four years of same ole, and for now I've decided not to take part.
 
season 9 it came from goo lagoon GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants
 
Back
Top