AM -->
Mr Bogus @ Mar. 01 2008 said:
1316405[/ATTACH] AM]
stock bike, 12K on chain, (.0015X112=.168" not .500)
but I do agree, chain length is more "wear" than "stretch" but the term "stretch" makes a lot more sense to most people (I can see a "longer" chain but I can not see a worn pin)..
I am sure that there are dozens of terms that are really technically incorrect but are used to keep things easier to understand..
I guess we could start a thread on them
oops!
multiplied .005 instead of .0015
.168 over the length of a stock chain isn't much.
Of course it's less than half of that when wrapped over top of itself and the sprockets.
Again if you go back and llok at the pic.
The Pin bushings and the pin itself take the wear.
If I replace the rear sprocket with a 42t count, will the 112 link chain still work or should I be looking a one a bit longer.
Whats everone using for chains?