Then we must respectfully agree to disagree.
I understand there have to be rules, and that some people object to visible tattoos. I just feel that denying a person who is otherwise qualified to be in a leadership position, and who would have made an excellent leader on the sole basis of visible ink is foolish.
When I was originally nominated for a commission, I was rejected by the selection board because my tattoos didn't present the image of an officer. I was asked if I would have them removed as a condition of being accepted to go to OCS. I refused and was rejected by the board. They weren't saying anything about me, or my ability to lead - just that I didn't look the way they wanted me to look and I could live with that... the next year I recieved orders to attend OCS, tattoos and all...