need an ADMIN to delete a thread?

fast08busa said:
Email it to me ill post it anywhere and everywhere


They can try and come to my house.........Oh no the power of the .org switch is about to turn on......:whistle:
Click to expand...

:snap: Wow that shop does not know what they got in to...


Anyone remember the name of the shop?
 
wow thats about all i can say is wow. I would like to call them and express my thoughts but i do not want to do anything that could cause more issues to you and your partner. Let me know if there anything i can do to help you out though pls.
 
yup they made it wayyyy worse on them selves. Though I am feeling pretty powerful. Hard to hold my tongue for sure :rulez:
 
Laylas_Mom said:
cops said something about slander and loss of revenue or some crap like that.
Click to expand...

You have not slandered anyone by telling the truth about an item which you have personal knowledge of. I bet the cops were related to the owner of the shop! And besides let them sue you. You have any idea how hard that is to prove?

Have them read this:
SLANDER
A false defamation (expressed in spoken words, signs, or gestures) which injures the character or reputation of the person defamed; distinguished from libel.

The defaming a man in his reputation by speaking or writing words which affect his life, office, or trade, or which tend to his loss of preferment in marriage or service, or in his inheritance, or which occasion any other particular damage. In England, if slander be spoken of a peer, or other great man, it is called Scandalum Magnatum. Falsity and malice are ingredients of slander. Written or printed slanders are libels.

Here it is proposed to treat of verbal slander only, which may be considered with reference to, 1st. The nature of the accusation. 2d. The falsity of the charge. 3d. The mode of publication. 4th. The occasion; and 5th. The malice or motive of the slander.Actionable words are of two descriptions; first, those actionable in themselves, without proof of special damages and, secondly, those actionable only in respect of some actual consequential damages. Words of the first description must impute:

1st. The guilt of some offence for which the party, if guilty, might be indicted and punished by the criminal courts; as to call a person a "traitor," "thief," "highwayman;" or to say that he is guilty of "perjury," "forgery," "murder," and the like. And although the imputation of guilt be general, without stating the particulars of the pretended crime, it is actionable. - 2d. That the party has a disease or distemper which renders him unfit for society. An action can therefore be sustained for calling a man a leper. But charging another with having had a contagious disease is not actionable, as he will not, on that account, be excluded from society. A charge which renders a man ridiculous, and impairs the enjoyment of general society, and injures those imperfect rights of friendly intercourse and mutual benevolence which man has with respect to man, is also actionable. - 3d. Unfitness in an officer, who holds an office to which profit or emolument is attached, either in respect of morals or inability to discharge the duties of the office in such a case an action lies. - 4th. The want of integrity or capacity, whether mental or pecuniary, in the conduct of a profession, trade or business, in which the party is engaged, is actionable as to accuse an attorney or artist of inability, inattention, or want of integrity or a clergyman of being a drunkard;

Of the second class are words which are actionable only in respect of special damages sustained by the party slandered. Though the law will not permit in these cases the inference of damage, yet when the damage has actually been sustained, the party aggrieved may support an action for the publication of an untruth unless the assertion be made for the assertion of a supposed claim. Action upon the case for Defamation but it lies if maliciously spoken.

The charge must be false; the falsity of the accusation is to be implied till the contrary is shown. The instance of a master making an unfavorable representation of his servant, upon an application for his character, seems to be an exception, in that case there being a presumption from the occasion of the speaking, that the words were true.

The slander must, of course, be published, that is communicated to a third person; and if verbal, then in a language which he understands, otherwise the plaintiff's reputation is not impaired. A letter addressed to the party, containing libelous matter, is not sufficient to maintain a civil action, though it may subject the libeler to an indictment, as tending to a breach of the peace; the slander must be published respecting the plaintiff; a mother cannot maintain an action for calling her daughter a bastard.

To render words actionable, they must be uttered without legal occasion. On some occasions it is justifiable to utter slander of another, in others it is excusable, provided it be uttered without express malice. It is justifiable for au attorney to use scandalizing expressions in support of his client's cause and pertinent thereto. Members of congress and other legislative assemblies cannot be called to account for anything said in debate.

Malice is essential to the support of an action for slanderous words. But malice is in general to be presumed until the contrary be prove except in those cases where the occasion prima facie excuses the publication.

SLANDERER
A calumniator, who maliciously and without reason imputes a crime or fault to another, of which he is innocent. For this offence, when the slander is merely verbal, the remedy is an action on the case for damages; when it is reduced to writing or printing, it is a libel.
Click to expand...

You have not said anything false have you?
This is one time when crooks have been caught and labeled and they are trying to gang up on an innocent and concerned person. You should call the chief and tell him you are gonna sue them for mental trauma!
 
fast08busa said:
Tell ya what, lets see how much just two people can screw this people, i volunteer and I nominate RusselJ.....
Click to expand...

Wait what about me...
yosemite-sam.gif
 
I'm fairly sure this issue has caused you undue stress and placed a large amount of fear and saftey concerns on you. These may take years and years to fully be healed and you will most likely need to be financially compensated for your situation. I think a lawyer may say something like that :laugh::laugh:
 
Gpmo said:
I'm fairly sure this issue has caused you undue stress and placed a large amount of fear and saftey concerns on you. These may take years and years to fully be healed and you will most likely need to be financially compensated for your situation. I think a lawyer may say something like that :laugh::laugh:
Click to expand...

Yeah a dealer threatened her because she told the truth online and now she's afraid to post on the org anymore!
That's gotta be worth millions!
 
when he made the threat to me I was like....badddddd move homie. I got peoples everywhere... But Ill play nice cause it doesnt only effect me. This time.:whistle:
 
the Constitution protects free speech. :rulez:

if you would like more info on how to stand up for your self. contact Duncan Philp with the Wyoming tyranny response team. he is a pro at stuff like this! :thumbsup: and im sure would love to lend a hand.

Duncan Philp | Facebook
 
Red1100cc knows his stuff on this and i would see what his contact would have to say. If you are going to do something do it right and thoroughly :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WWJD
delete the post ##### thread
2
Replies
22
Views
1,573
BusaFever
B
RaiderDm
Strange case
Replies
17
Views
734
BA BUSA
BA BUSA
K
Whiskey and posting don't mix...
Replies
12
Views
1,360
GsxrBots
GsxrBots
rubbersidedown
All threads with over-sized pictures
Replies
15
Views
892
EastCoast
E
MC MUSTANG
Housekeeping on the boards
Replies
5
Views
581
heavybusa
heavybusa
Back
Top