G
Guest
Oh, please....
Now I think we are all in agreement on this one, 2QK4U. I would say that all three bikes are comperable, but this just is not so. Fact is that the ZX-11 is very outdated, as it's design is over 10 years old. I used to have one of those, a "D" model. I also used to have a Yamaha FJ1100 before that. I love big bores, and I have a tremendous amount of respect for all of them. But the ZX is pretty antiquated.
I am not saying that yours isn't fast... It obviously is! Stock, they are fast as hell, and you don't have to prove that. They have been untouchable for years! But the old design is dead now, and if it wasn't for your performance mods, you'd be in a solid third place in that race.
Congrats on a fast bike. If you made it faster than last years' XX, then you deserve the credit of making your second place bike first again. This years' XX is even faster, with the go-stuff for a faster bike. Nobody is arguing that the Abuser isn't faster... I never said it wasn't.
But the idea that the ZX, in stock form anyway, beats a XX and that the XX is in third... Well, that simply isn't true.
Tell ya what... Let's look at it this way, K? First would be the 'Busa (no arguement here), (okay, okay) next would be your bike with it's performance mods (if you are for real and not some bench racer squid), then would be the new XX, last year's XX, and then a stock ZX-11. Satisfied?
'Course, the pack of them would all be so close, I think, and the real first place bike would probably be whoever was the guy that could consistently launch his bike best, again talking about rider skill. But with all riders, weights, and conditions equal...
Now I think we are all in agreement on this one, 2QK4U. I would say that all three bikes are comperable, but this just is not so. Fact is that the ZX-11 is very outdated, as it's design is over 10 years old. I used to have one of those, a "D" model. I also used to have a Yamaha FJ1100 before that. I love big bores, and I have a tremendous amount of respect for all of them. But the ZX is pretty antiquated.
I am not saying that yours isn't fast... It obviously is! Stock, they are fast as hell, and you don't have to prove that. They have been untouchable for years! But the old design is dead now, and if it wasn't for your performance mods, you'd be in a solid third place in that race.
Congrats on a fast bike. If you made it faster than last years' XX, then you deserve the credit of making your second place bike first again. This years' XX is even faster, with the go-stuff for a faster bike. Nobody is arguing that the Abuser isn't faster... I never said it wasn't.
But the idea that the ZX, in stock form anyway, beats a XX and that the XX is in third... Well, that simply isn't true.
Tell ya what... Let's look at it this way, K? First would be the 'Busa (no arguement here), (okay, okay) next would be your bike with it's performance mods (if you are for real and not some bench racer squid), then would be the new XX, last year's XX, and then a stock ZX-11. Satisfied?
'Course, the pack of them would all be so close, I think, and the real first place bike would probably be whoever was the guy that could consistently launch his bike best, again talking about rider skill. But with all riders, weights, and conditions equal...