New Triumph is faster than Busa

[BentValve]

Id ride it once just to feel that torque.

 

[cooper]

classic comedy

 

[shenoyp]

...This is pure, simple CRAZY

 

[him]

thier cool man but i think that the busas 0-60 time is supposed to be around 2.3 secs.

 

[2005BigBoy]

Entertaing info, but interesting to say the least.

 

[Elsboss]

Pretty ridiculous claim when first thinking about it. 90% of that quotient would be clutch management and tire spin anyhow. Another dyno drag type of analogy and pure BS.

As someone here stated and well put, every MFG uses the 'Busa as a basis of comparison simply because...it's the best. That unto itself is quite the compliment but any discerning Rocket III buyer would have to ask themselves; "what about 41 mph to 180?". Yeah, right.

Elliot

 

[FL Knifemaker]

I'm going to disagree with those that consider it a good looking cruiser. Maybe parked next to one of those BMW cruisers, it's good looking but...................

 

[onerabidshark]

Still have to give it to Triumph A+ on cruisers, B on the sportbike cause it won't maintain the accelaration. Maybee a C+.



<!--EDIT|onerabidshark
Reason for Edit: None given...|1114002465 -->

 

[babuski]

HIM is right.....they have the zero to sixty specs WRONG.....the busa goes from zero to sixty in about 2.4 seconds.....and this I proved myself with a friend and a stop watch. (of course I weigh only 175 so its unfair...)

 

[7th Gear]

Did the Busa have gas <span style='font-size:15pt;line-height:100%'></span>

?

 

[GMbusa]

Bring it.
Eastside speedway here in Va.
Callin you out Triumph!