Those officers are lucky he only wanted to harm himself in the end. There could have been alot more dead good guys on that one.
Now, if we could only convince all the other criminals to take the same route, we could save a fortune.At least he won't be wasting as much taxpayers money
I got that email at work a few weeks ago from a guy who has a buddy in Customs...man, look at how his hands curl in from the instant brain trauma. The best part is when the guy comes running back in and you hear "AWWWW, !@#$%"...I emailed it to the Chief Deputy of the county I currently work in; he's a drug detective for this county and he's a sick bastid, he thought it was just hilarious....I mean, how could a guy not pat him down...I mean, even just a cursory pat down...Come On!"You see, we had this guy in custody and was about to interrogate him when he pulled this pistol out and..." "How did he get the gun? Well, I guess we didn't search him..."
NOT WORK SAFE... GRAPHIC VIOLENCE TO ONE'S SELF DO NOT CLICK IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE IT...
Oooops... Sorry chief.
NO KIDDING! I mean, do these guys know what a "search incident to arrest" is...? Come on!No negligence on the department's part but a LOT of it on the officers' parts. I'm quite sure the department has policies in place on searching apprehended subjects upon arrest.The guy obviously felt guilty about something,but still gross negligence on the depts. part.
No @#$%!...hee hee, "where's the gun?" "yeah, we couldn't find the weapon he used..." "it has to be around here somewhere..."Are ya'll readin' the write-up with it? He ran from the popo and shot one of them in the gut. He WAS guilty...
AMEN!!I'm glad that he didn't decide to take anyone else with him.
Not really that uncommon from my experiences.First: I watched the video, and read the entire article along with it.
Second: The question I have is simple. Why was there no exit wound?
If the article is correct that it was a .45 cal, Colt M1911, then it just doesn't make sense that there would not be an exit wound. I could understand if it was a little .22 or .25 cal, but were talking about a .45 cal. It just seems that if we're talking about a round with that much energy at point-blank range, it wouldn't stop after only passing through one layer of bone/brain.
I'm not a balistic expert, but it just doesn't make sense.
Thanks for the info...I honestly wasn't too sure about it.Not really that uncommon from my experiences.First: I watched the video, and read the entire article along with it.
Second: The question I have is simple. Why was there no exit wound?
If the article is correct that it was a .45 cal, Colt M1911, then it just doesn't make sense that there would not be an exit wound. I could understand if it was a little .22 or .25 cal, but were talking about a .45 cal. It just seems that if we're talking about a round with that much energy at point-blank range, it wouldn't stop after only passing through one layer of bone/brain.
I'm not a balistic expert, but it just doesn't make sense.
I agree. There are many types of rounds for the .45, but the average thug isn't going to spend the extra money on Sabolt rounds or Talons. They'll either have FMJ or SWC rounds.First of all it depends on ammunition! there are many anti personnel rounds out there designed NOT to pass through (but that is not always the law!!) then the .45 is a big slow round designed for knock down power! with ball or teflon coated ammunition a .40 SW would stand a better chance of passing through. Now if it was an ammunition like the "Talon" it is designed to enter and open up and split apart in many very sharp pieces and more then likely never pass through!!
Now if you wanna talk rifle rounds thats a whole other story!!
I have up and close and personally witnessed a bosnians head explode like the watermelon in Bruce Willis's movie The Jackal, but it was a russian 14.5mm round. Our .50 bmg is only 12.5mm
Thank you!I agree. There are many types of rounds for the .45, but the average thug isn't going to spend the extra money on Sabolt rounds or Talons. They'll either have FMJ or SWC rounds.First of all it depends on ammunition! there are many anti personnel rounds out there designed NOT to pass through (but that is not always the law!!) then the .45 is a big slow round designed for knock down power! with ball or teflon coated ammunition a .40 SW would stand a better chance of passing through. Now if it was an ammunition like the "Talon" it is designed to enter and open up and split apart in many very sharp pieces and more then likely never pass through!!
Now if you wanna talk rifle rounds thats a whole other story!!
I have up and close and personally witnessed a bosnians head explode like the watermelon in Bruce Willis's movie The Jackal, but it was a russian 14.5mm round. Our .50 bmg is only 12.5mm
Either way...the world is rid of one more loser