The Suzuki safety switch philosophy sucks.
Kawasakis will start without the clutch if in neutral; if in gear, they require the clutch be disengaged. That makes perfect sense.
Unless there is no way I can park my bike level enough, or against a curb, I ALWAYS park in neutral. With the Kaw, I turn on the key and can punch the starter button without using two hands. If it doesn't fire, I know it is in gear.
As mentioned, all the Suzuki method does is make a habit out of pulling in the clutch every time it is started, so if you forget you have it in gear and let the clutch out after it starts, the bike jerks forward and falls on its side.
Sidestand switches make sense to me. I once almost high-sided as a young rider from forgetting the sidestand and riding off.
The tip over sensor is something I could do without. If I'm on the ground, I have more important things to think about than my motor going bang. It is insured...
Blue
Kawasakis will start without the clutch if in neutral; if in gear, they require the clutch be disengaged. That makes perfect sense.
Unless there is no way I can park my bike level enough, or against a curb, I ALWAYS park in neutral. With the Kaw, I turn on the key and can punch the starter button without using two hands. If it doesn't fire, I know it is in gear.
As mentioned, all the Suzuki method does is make a habit out of pulling in the clutch every time it is started, so if you forget you have it in gear and let the clutch out after it starts, the bike jerks forward and falls on its side.
Sidestand switches make sense to me. I once almost high-sided as a young rider from forgetting the sidestand and riding off.
The tip over sensor is something I could do without. If I'm on the ground, I have more important things to think about than my motor going bang. It is insured...
Blue