VERY interesting topic! I have pondered the thoughts and occasions surrounding this many times myself. Sometimes I wonder if *I* was the only one that thought about such things. Good to see I am not. I would, however, like to expand on a couple of the key points expressed, not neccessarily to illicite an answer so much as to stimulate further conversation along these same or similar lines. Perhaps we could open the floor [or post] at this time to invite others into the discussion of the topic. So back to my points to address, I think the first part could easily become a book worth of info, if we extrapolated the unified rectification of proponderance. ONLY, I repeat ONLY if plausible subsidiaries co-existed with the final conclusions presented. The second point I wanted to reticulate on was the paragraph containing specifics surrounding the effects of the prior paragraph stating specifically of the generalities. I felt the presentation was downplayed and deserved more smackulation over the belitted responses quothified the endherance. It's rare to see such and interesting and pivitol topic brought up in public forums and the responses yielded are usually both honest and passionate. I think we should keep discussing this topic until it has been beaten to death from every direction and every possible opinion. THEN, maybe we could come to the formumatical conclusion proving finitely that the answer truly is 42.