eynlai--
No worries man, in fact I don't think we are necessarily 180deg on this one.
You ask: Why must most people base quality on price??[/QUOTE]
The answer really is simple, experience. My whole life, when buying ANYTHING, I have found that there is NO free ride. Seems to be universally true. You will get what you pay for... To a point*... Bikes, Cars, Fishing Poles, Knives, Clothes, SHOES, watches, hookers
... By and large you get what you pay for. I mean a $10 hooker will get you to the same end destination that a $1000 hooker will get you right? But all things considered, I will spend the extra money for the $1000 hooker cause I am willing to bet the experience will be much better, more energetic, more fun, (will perform better).
I said: *There is a point of diminishing returns however. For instance the Vemar Carbon??? $800 Nope no thanks, looks cool as fug but not worth the extra bones[/QUOTE]
I drive an Infiniti, it's not flashy but it's got good power, a quiet ride, and a good solid feel. But does it perform it's BASIC function better than a Pontiac Grand Am? Nope, both will get you from start to finish. However, the feel and the experience of the Infiniti is better, more refined, quieter, smoother, better handling, and more solid. So it's NOT a matter of personal preference. It's measurable, quantifiable. We could put a yardstick to em both and say at the end "OK the Infiniti costs $15K more, but you get this better stuff for your extra money. "
Then Compare the Infiniti against BMW, and the same is true yet again. This time when we measure the BMW comes out on top in each category. It does everything better than the Infiniti, but costs $15k more. No worries that extra $ comes back in resale...
But when comparing BMW to Mercedes things get muddy. It's 99% preference, there really cannot be a distinct "Winner" based on value, it's all about preference. One is a little sportier, which one "Fits" or which is a little more solid etc.
There is REAL value here again but the BMW still performs the same basic functions as a Chevy Sprint, It gets you from A-B.
OK, NOW Dude "A" buys a brand new Mercedes S500, Dude "B" buys a new Rolls-Royce costing about $150k more than the Top of line Mercedes. NOW, is the Rolls owner buying for "VALUE"? NO, is the ROLLS $150k better than the MERC? NO, so here (IMO) is where you hit the point of diminishing returns, where further investment will not result in a measurable, quantifiable improvement in the experience.
What I am saying is that there is obviously a point, where spending more money becomes a matter of personal preference not really a quest for more value or superior performance.
*********I AM JUST USING THE ABOVE AS EXAMPLES FOLKS... DON'T START BITCHING, I AM JUST ILLUSTRATING MY POINT***********
OK now bring this to the helmet discussion finally.
I do not believe that ARAI has reached the Point of diminishing returns when compared to less expensive helmets. It will be a measurably safer, better warrantied, better fitting, better vented, lighter, and better supported helmet than just about anything else you will find on the market.
However, I did say: Buy ANY helmet with a DOT and SNELL rating and you'll be good to go. [/QUOTE]
So eynlai, we are not really in dispute over this. In the end if both are SNELL AND DOT rated it means they met the
Minimum requirements for both foundations. But I will say that an ARAI will stand up to impacts much better than a cheaper helmet, it will simply work better at protecting your head, above and beyond SNELL and yeah I stake my life on it every time I put it on.
I will argue that ARAI is hand made, and EVERY Arai is hand inspected, Arai is trusted by more professionals in Motorcycle Racing and F1 than any other brand, Arai is still a Japanese family owned and operated company making helmets by hand, they take personal pride in their product, and Arai's customer Service and warranty is tops. Lost a visor cover off my Re-entry, a few calls and bam there it is via fedex, took a week...
I find it strange in a way that ANYONE would look at saving money on something so critical to your survival. Would you buy a car that had "New Inexpensive seat Belts?" or Fly in a plane that was using a "New Less expensive Pilot?†Or a pilot that met the
“MINUMUM†requirements?
How about a child seat that while being stain resistant, used cheaper webbing for the belts?
(Or Oil that just barely meets the minimum requirements? He he he sorry..)
I can think of ALOT of other places to save a Buck on things less critical to your life than your helmet.
Now, Having 14 reviewers rate Scorpion highly is cool, no doubt, they could very well be good helmets, I cannot say otherwise having not tried them, but what do ANY of these reviewers you linked to know about how they perform their most critical function??? Where is Scorpion’s 30 or so years of track crash data??? It's about more than saving a buck when it comes to my head and more than ANY other helmet manufacturer out there, I know I can rely on the ARAI on my head to do it's job 100% percent of time, no questions about crappy laminate, poor quality control, or lack of experienced hands in the build process... That combined with the perfect fit (FOR EVERYONE if one model doesn't fit they have others that are shaped differently), smaller exterior shell size, excellent visors, and air flow is worth every penny. Hell I can even get dramatic and say it’s “Pricelessâ€â€¦
I would wonder where Scorpion, HJC, etc.. are cutting costs. What corners are cut? What employees are underpaid enough to no longer care? To meet the price point set by Scorpion. It’s coming outta somewhere… Especially when you consider all of the "NEW Hi-Tech Features"...
Whew, Did you read all of that? I think I make a valid point or two... Sorry for the length...
Rev