Wannabe,
I appreciate you bud. Very well written and thought out. Faye Myers needs a smack in the face some how some way. This would work!
I just called my son after sending him your writeup in a text. He had just got off the phone with MV and express they have to take the ball on this for has has no intention of letting Faye Meyers work on his bike again. They took detailed notes to include VIN which should be tracked from dealers inputs for warranty. If they did the ignition and fuel pump then MV knows and if they didn't they know now. Faye Meyers should not be selling bikes they can't work on. MV indicated that someone from Head of Operations would be in touch with him very soon.
Lets see what's next. He does love the bike and prefers it to be perfect and enjoy it. I've got a good mind to put all this info on their FB page but I guess we need to let MV HQ's to their thing.
Thanks Orgsters!
I appreciate you bud. Very well written and thought out. Faye Myers needs a smack in the face some how some way. This would work!
I just called my son after sending him your writeup in a text. He had just got off the phone with MV and express they have to take the ball on this for has has no intention of letting Faye Meyers work on his bike again. They took detailed notes to include VIN which should be tracked from dealers inputs for warranty. If they did the ignition and fuel pump then MV knows and if they didn't they know now. Faye Meyers should not be selling bikes they can't work on. MV indicated that someone from Head of Operations would be in touch with him very soon.
Lets see what's next. He does love the bike and prefers it to be perfect and enjoy it. I've got a good mind to put all this info on their FB page but I guess we need to let MV HQ's to their thing.
Thanks Orgsters!
I am unsure that this is a lemon as I do not trust anything the dealer determined including which of the parts supposedly failed. They may have proactively caused every problem that occurred beginning with the rearset swap, or alternatively misdiagnosed issues in the first place. It sounds like semantics as The Lemon Law would be an asset to help return the bike, but it needs to be considered when deciding if you want to keep the bike.
The bike needs a factory certified tech to bolt it together correctly, troubleshoot it and repair any existing problems. This dealership does not likely employ said person.
One question to ask moving forward is: If this was beautifully resolved, where would you go for the next valve check, general maintenance, or problem?
If you decide to try and get it repaired and keep it, I would type a letter to the US HQ of MVA and send it certified and overnight. End it with "What would you recommend that we do?" Make sure and include the detail for the record, "We are currently concerned with a disastrous fuel fire or explosion leading to someone's death." That is not an unfair exaggeration but it does behoove you to include practical considerations that companies by law have to address. If they do not address such they risk creating a massive liability for themselves. This detail can help assure that they take some sort of action on your behalf.
The car network has regional techs that are called in and charge $$$$$ to fix problems that techs worked weeks on, and this is the type of result I would hope for. It would be nice if MVA had a certified tech in your region and stuck them on the project. If I wanted to keep the bike that would be the one resolution I could agree to. No assurance from the dealer approaches this, which is why I do not think that pressure on the dealership has any value to you.