OB_Fast_Eddie
Registered
Went to New York this week for a conference and needed some reading material for the plane, so I picked up a copy of Sport Rider.
They have a monthly column called "Wheel Spin" and they flat out say "...Kawasaki's 12R and Suzuki's 2000 'Busa have electronic speed limiters.
Anyone else see this? I don't buy it myself, seems to me if they did, every test in existence would have the SAME top MPH reading for both bikes, if indeed they were electronically limited.
I say this because if indeed they were limited electronically, they both would perform up to that electronically limited point and that point only, correct??
They claim a best run of 184.0 for the 'Busa and 183.0 for the 12R...
Now I can't vouch for anything faster on my '00 because I have "only" seen 195 on the speedo. If I take Sport Rider's take as gospel, that would be around 6% speedo correction which from the factory is within reason (and Suzuki's spec').
They also claim in the column that the top speed for the '99 they tested was "only" 189.6, but also say that they were confident that it would have broken 190 if they didn't have problems with there test area.
I believe this to be total bullshit anyway. I think TurboRick was able to get way more than that on his stock '99, correct??
Anyone else see this and have an opinion??
BTW, they do say that they "deduced" this conclusion, meaning that they have absolutley no confirmation from either manufacturer.
They have a monthly column called "Wheel Spin" and they flat out say "...Kawasaki's 12R and Suzuki's 2000 'Busa have electronic speed limiters.
Anyone else see this? I don't buy it myself, seems to me if they did, every test in existence would have the SAME top MPH reading for both bikes, if indeed they were electronically limited.
I say this because if indeed they were limited electronically, they both would perform up to that electronically limited point and that point only, correct??
They claim a best run of 184.0 for the 'Busa and 183.0 for the 12R...
Now I can't vouch for anything faster on my '00 because I have "only" seen 195 on the speedo. If I take Sport Rider's take as gospel, that would be around 6% speedo correction which from the factory is within reason (and Suzuki's spec').
They also claim in the column that the top speed for the '99 they tested was "only" 189.6, but also say that they were confident that it would have broken 190 if they didn't have problems with there test area.
I believe this to be total bullshit anyway. I think TurboRick was able to get way more than that on his stock '99, correct??
Anyone else see this and have an opinion??
BTW, they do say that they "deduced" this conclusion, meaning that they have absolutley no confirmation from either manufacturer.