it could be worse..we could be talking about how corrupt stretching is.
Oh lordy, now you done it Rashad! You have gone off the deep end and confused your beloved busa with the current democratic party!
Stretching vs Non-Stretching
- Thread starter mvanlone
- Start date
Oh lordy, now you done it Rashad! You have gone off the deep end and confused your beloved busa with the current democratic party!
Well, for handling keep it stock or make adjustments, suspension mods, and put some great tires on her.
If you like the look, go for it. It is your ride.
For certain types of racing stretch it, and make suspension mods so you can improve that 60' time.
If you like the look, go for it. It is your ride.
For certain types of racing stretch it, and make suspension mods so you can improve that 60' time.
BigRod1300
Registered
Personally, I think they look ugly stretched, but that's just my opinion. Probably gonna catch some flack for that.
NO flack....each have an opinion, cause Im just the op of you aslong as its not to far out.
Ft Campbell Busa
Registered
Stretched for me! I am at the track every week also. I did not buy mine for the twisties!
Raymanovski
Registered
Mine is 4 over (330 osd) Looks great but as it comes to pure handling of the bike thats all gone!!
NavyLucky78
Registered
I think I am going to choose.....ummmm....let's see.....Non-stretchy side. That sounds good. Ride the bike for what you want. Make mods accordingly.
BigRod1300
Registered
I got to stick to the stretched side since mine is 4" longer. Just enough so i don't loose to much lean angle but still longer then stock. My main reason for lengthen was the ugly gap between the end of the tail and the end of the tire. You can tell in the pics the difference between stock and 4". The 4" doesn't create a big gap between the tire and motor either. But that is all personal preference.
Steve
Steve
Similar threads
