I understand your frustration as I went through the same thing with a skull cap a few months ago. However, we must always look at both sides of the equation to fully understand the situation. If I were to make something, a widget, for example. I would not want anyone else making widgets or copies of the widgets and then selling them for profit. I bet you a dollar against a donut, that Harley Davidson has patents and copyrights they enforce as well. Carry on peeps!
I'd be willing to push for this. What's their problem??
I understand your frustration as I went through the same thing with a skull cap a few months ago. However, we must always look at both sides of the equation to fully understand the situation. If I were to make something, a widget, for example. I would not want anyone else making widgets or copies of the widgets and then selling them for profit. I bet you a dollar against a donut, that Harley Davidson has patents and copyrights they enforce as well. Carry on peeps!
COPYRIGHT is their problem, they (being Suzuki) created or paid someone originally to create said artwork therefore it is their property, it belongs to them and only them. By law they have all legal rights to that artwork and anyone reproducing it in any manner without proper licensing authorized by the owner (Suzuki) is in violation of the law, in layman's terms it is theft. You don't like it when someone steals your personal property do you? Think I'm kidding? Set up shop somewhere and try to sell Harley-Davidson or Disney merchandise without acquiring proper licensing, many of small uneducated garment/sign shops have been shut down by an army of HD attorneys simply for selling a couple shirts or stickers. Yes all ebay sellers selling any decal, banner, shirt, etc. bearing corporate logos/artwork without acquiring proper licensing from that company are breaking the law.
COPYRIGHT is their problem, they (being Suzuki) created or paid someone originally to create said artwork therefore it is their property, it belongs to them and only them. By law they have all legal rights to that artwork and anyone reproducing it in any manner without proper licensing authorized by the owner (Suzuki) is in violation of the law, in layman's terms it is theft. You don't like it when someone steals your personal property do you? Think I'm kidding? Set up shop somewhere and try to sell Harley-Davidson or Disney merchandise without acquiring proper licensing, many of small uneducated garment/sign shops have been shut down by an army of HD attorneys simply for selling a couple shirts or stickers. Yes all ebay sellers selling any decal, banner, shirt, etc. bearing corporate logos/artwork without acquiring proper licensing from that company are breaking the law.
You missed my point entirely. I was pondering why Suzuki won't endorse this nice product.
I think CP should break the product up into a few pieces and sell each piece individually. This way each individual piece can't be considered anyone's property and when its assembled at the endpoint, it is done so in the buyers private environment. The Kanji symbol certainly isn't exclusive to Suzuki, nor is the lighting or affixing materials. As far as the Hayabusa wording goes, get rid of it because it will just get bled out from the light.
A good Lawyer could argue that the Kanji, when designed for placement on a Suzuki bike, is a willful violation of copyright. If you were using the Kanji in a bird sanctuary, it would be a different story.