Everyone knows there was an emotional youtube video where a bevy of Hollywood "stars" in the wake of Sandy Hook, using the emotion of the event to make a pitch for new and more extreme gun control.
Someone took that video, and inserted clips of those same 'stars' in their violent, gun and killing-filled scenes that helped make them said 'stars'. The first video was unpublishable to the .org because of foul language. In it, these same 'stars' are seen for the hypocrites they really are. One scene in particular grabs/sickens me the most, where Cameron Diaz is pointing a gun at the head of a child. I consider threatening children to be crossing the taboo line. We should NEVER allow threatening children to be part of a director's "creativity" and have First Amendment protections. Shame on who?
Enough people asked that the language be removed so that the video could be disseminated to a wider audience who would lose the message due to the messenger (the language); here it is. Warning: Scenes of gratuitious violence which, while PG13, will be offensive to some (including me), but I think it sends a powerful message straight back down Hollywood's throat that their "creativity" and "art" are chock full of unintended consequences. Before there is ANY talk of a gun ban, how about a 10-year trial 'ban' on this kind of violence on TV, Video Games and Movies? Oh, wait, that would be a violation of the First Amendment.
Mods: Feel free to discuss/pull it if you think it's too much for the .org. IMHO I don't think it crosses the .orgs lines.
Gun control is a tight 3-round shot group...
Someone took that video, and inserted clips of those same 'stars' in their violent, gun and killing-filled scenes that helped make them said 'stars'. The first video was unpublishable to the .org because of foul language. In it, these same 'stars' are seen for the hypocrites they really are. One scene in particular grabs/sickens me the most, where Cameron Diaz is pointing a gun at the head of a child. I consider threatening children to be crossing the taboo line. We should NEVER allow threatening children to be part of a director's "creativity" and have First Amendment protections. Shame on who?
Enough people asked that the language be removed so that the video could be disseminated to a wider audience who would lose the message due to the messenger (the language); here it is. Warning: Scenes of gratuitious violence which, while PG13, will be offensive to some (including me), but I think it sends a powerful message straight back down Hollywood's throat that their "creativity" and "art" are chock full of unintended consequences. Before there is ANY talk of a gun ban, how about a 10-year trial 'ban' on this kind of violence on TV, Video Games and Movies? Oh, wait, that would be a violation of the First Amendment.
Mods: Feel free to discuss/pull it if you think it's too much for the .org. IMHO I don't think it crosses the .orgs lines.
Gun control is a tight 3-round shot group...
Last edited by a moderator: