bhawksworth
Registered
This is sort of bike-related. Kind of.
My brother and I have a long-standing argument about the forces on a motorcycle when turning. Essentially, it comes down to this: If a straw, sealed at both ends, containing a ball bearing (small enough to move in the straw), was fastened to a motorcycle so that the straw was horizontal to the ground, and the motorcycle was leaned around a corner, he thinks the ball bearing would not fall to the end of the straw closest to the ground.
His reasoning is that when the motorcycle is turning and leaned over, centrifugal forces would act against gravity, so that the ball bearing would not roll to the bottom of the straw closest to the ground. Generally, I think he's arguing that centrifugal forces act opposite to the direction of lean (i.e. they act 'upward', in a sense).
I on the other hand argue that centrifugal forces act 'downward' at the angle of lean. In other words, I picture the bike describing an arc as though the driver's helmet was attached to a pivot point in the sky by a long string, with forces acting downward 'along' the string. This force acts to hold the rider on the bike, etc.
So, my view is that centrifugal forces would act in a downward way on the ball bearing through the middle of the straw (not along the straw opposite to the angle of lean as my brother thinks it would), which wouldn't be enough to counteract gravity, and so the bearing would roll down.
I also think that if he's right, we'd all fly off our bikes as we took fast corners, due to centrifugal forces acting upward and opposite to the angle of lean, as he argues.
Anyway, I know this is idiotic... but am I right or is he right?
My brother and I have a long-standing argument about the forces on a motorcycle when turning. Essentially, it comes down to this: If a straw, sealed at both ends, containing a ball bearing (small enough to move in the straw), was fastened to a motorcycle so that the straw was horizontal to the ground, and the motorcycle was leaned around a corner, he thinks the ball bearing would not fall to the end of the straw closest to the ground.
His reasoning is that when the motorcycle is turning and leaned over, centrifugal forces would act against gravity, so that the ball bearing would not roll to the bottom of the straw closest to the ground. Generally, I think he's arguing that centrifugal forces act opposite to the direction of lean (i.e. they act 'upward', in a sense).
I on the other hand argue that centrifugal forces act 'downward' at the angle of lean. In other words, I picture the bike describing an arc as though the driver's helmet was attached to a pivot point in the sky by a long string, with forces acting downward 'along' the string. This force acts to hold the rider on the bike, etc.
So, my view is that centrifugal forces would act in a downward way on the ball bearing through the middle of the straw (not along the straw opposite to the angle of lean as my brother thinks it would), which wouldn't be enough to counteract gravity, and so the bearing would roll down.
I also think that if he's right, we'd all fly off our bikes as we took fast corners, due to centrifugal forces acting upward and opposite to the angle of lean, as he argues.
Anyway, I know this is idiotic... but am I right or is he right?