Unfortunately, Pit Bulls have been getting a lot of bad press recently. We had an incident with one in our neighborhood a couple of years ago where a police officer had to shoot the dog (because it's owner was nowhere to be found and it was running loose, harassing people and other dogs.)
I agree that it's down to the owners to control their dogs, but Pit Bulls have become a "fashionable" breed to own, and a percentage of their owners don't seem to be able to train them to be well-behaved, or they are simply neglecting them/deliberately raising them to be agressive (drug dealers etc.)
Once an animal aquires a reputation for being "mean" there is understandable pressure on the authorities to prevent people from owning them (try explaining to someone whose family member has just been mauled by a Pity Bull that yours is "cute" and "affectionate".) Your average member of the public doesn't want to risk any possibility of themselves or family members being bitten or killed by an apparently agressive animal.
People who bought/adopted Pit Bulls (and similar breeds) in the past must have been aware of the mounting negative publicity, but chose to ignore it. Now they are being faced with the possibility of having their pet put down. Perhaps if they'd bought/adopted a breed with a "good" reputation they wouldn't be in the position they're in now.
Let's face it, you don't "have" to own a Pit Bull, the only reason for doing so nowadays in the face of so much negative publicity is that they're "edgy" and "cool" and "the neighbors will be impressed". There are plenty of other great dog breeds to choose from in all shapes and sizes that seem less likely to eat your children.
Personally, I'd like to own a Cheetah or a Black Panther, but I understand why it's not practical where I live, so I have domestic cats instead.
You said it all in your first sentence. These dogs are NOT bred to be people aggressive.
Once an individual dog is shown to be vicious or dangerous, it should be dealt with. Dobermans, Rotts, St Bernards, Mastiffs and Presa Canarios have all killed people. Why is there no hue and cry for these breeds to be destroyed or banned?
So you think the negative attention the media gives things in its never ending quest for sensationalism should dictate what type of dog I buy? The only people I see on the news depicted as "Gang bangers " are Black and Latin. Does this mean that I should avoid these races of people, or should I just avoid those particular individuals?
of course I don't have to own a Pit, but I have had them for many years and it is my decision what breed of dog to own. I am fully aware of the pedigree of theses type of dogs, and think that anyone who walks into my house uninvited, or allows their dog to wander around in the street un leashed gets exactly what they deserve. My dog will defend me, my family and my property with his life. Without question, without hesitation. how many people can you say that about?
The anaolgy you draw between Pits and big Cats is ridiculous. Dogs are domesticated animals, they do not prey on other animals for survival, are not regulated by the Federal Government, and should not be the topic of all this hype. The owners are the ones who should be punished for failing to control their dogs.
Here's the "Vicious Pit Bull" That lives at my house. That's my cousin on the couch in the background, he's been to my house twice in the 5 years I've owned this dog. If you look close you can see that he's trembling in fear of the aggressive animal in front of him......