Is anybody else finding that the miles per gallon displayed in the tripmeter (tripmeter 1) doesn't match the mileage derived by dividing the number of miles traveled by the number of gallons pumped?
Here's my last three experiences:
Distance = 77.7 miles, tripmeter mpg 40.4 gallons pumped 2.611, actual mileage 29.5. Mostly freeway, some city streets, mostly 4,000 rpm or less.
Distance = 62.2 miles, tripmeter mpg 42.1 gallons pumped 1.685, actual mileage 37.2.
Nearly all freeway/highway, mostly 4,000 rpm or less.
Distance = 105.6, tripmeter mileage 44.7, gallons pumped 3.214, actual mileage 32.8.
Freeways/mountain highways, mostly 4,000 rpm or less.
Factors. California bike, '99, 5,981 miles. Stock tires. Distances traveled are approximately accurate. I tried to eliminate uneven refills as a factor the last two times by filling only to bottom of filler restrictor tube in the California tank (1/2 gallon less capacity for evaporation controls). Stock engine with Two Brothers slip-ons, ECU originally set at +5 +5 +10 with Yosh box when slip-ons installed last fall, but quickly reset to zero (or at least that's what I asked dealer to do) when bike ran worse than stock. Dealer did do something because bike ran better and got better mileage on the tripmeter. Bike still runs fine. (It will go over 4,000 rpm but pillion passenger won't.) Fuel filter recall done about 3,000 miles ago. Not checked since.
My Suzuki manual says the tripmeter uses ECU signal for injector time plus speed sensor signal to calculate miles per gallon. There is no evidence of fuel leaking, nor gasoline odor. The fuel filler cap whistles when bike is in sun, apparently from evaporation escaping, which dealer says they all do. (It didn't when it was newer.) But all of these measurements were done within hours of each other this past weekend, so how could evaporation be a significant factor?