TallTom
Registered
So let me ask you.
Were we as a nation better off back then turning a blind eye to a few thumps and bumps on a crook or now watching and complaining about all?
Better off to let the cops whack em a few and hopefully put forth a lesson to other possible thugs 'this is what you'll get' or protecting the 'rights' of pieces of crap criminals?
My dad was a cop back in those days. Back in those days cops were a more trusted profession. They were aligned more with what people felt was right or wrong. If they had a habitual problem person, they often made it clear that if he continued he would be dealt with. If he continued, yes they were known to have given someone a tune up out in a quiet place somewhere. But that doesn't mean beating the crap out of him. It may mean, you cracked him across the back or legs etc. Send him a clear message of what will come if he continued. If it continued, it got worse. Back in those days, they patrolled specific parts of town. They get to know what belongs there and what doesn't. Those people came to trust that the cop, whom they knew and respected, did the job the best way needed to maintain peace.
Nowadays, it isn't about negotiation, its about who has the power now. Taze him because its quick and effective, followed by now that he is helpless, lets play kick the can cuz we can.