white is the fastest color theorem
- Thread starter yamanista
- Start date
So then, how fast is an all chrome bike~?~
BTW, I don't do chrome...
BTW, I don't do chrome...
Your all wrong ! Its not white but 'Blanca' thats the fastest...
See what you started here Yamanista...it's a color riot~!~ 
See what you started here Yamanista...it's a color riot~!~
Yes prolly will get in trouble along the way if you keep saying 'blacks' are slower than the 'whites'...
I think after hearing all this I am a little surprized my bike hasn't separated with the different colors~!~
voodoolord
Registered
I hate to tell you this (especially from someone who really thinks BLUE is the fastest), but the fastest Color is actually RED:
Light travels at a constant speed in vaccum... 3 x 10^8 m/s...
But in media like air, glass, different wavelengths in the electromagnetic spectrum travel at different speeds.
Refractive Index n is inversely proportional to wavelength of light.
But refractive index = Speed of light in Vaccum/Speed of light in medium
Hence, speed of light in media is directly proportional to wavelength...
Since wavelength increases from Violet to Red,
Red travels the fastest...
Violet travels the slowest...
Doppler Shift
Red and blue shifts
Light from moving objects will appear to have different wavelengths depending on the relative motion of the source and the observer.
Observers looking at an object that is moving away from them see light that has a longer wavelength than it had when it was emitted (a redshift), while observers looking at an approaching source see light that is shifted to shorter wavelength (a blueshift).
The schematic diagram below shows a galactic star at the bottom left with its spectrum on the bottom right. The spectrum shows the dark absorption lines first seen by Fraunhofer. These lines can be used to identify the chemical elements in distant stars, but they also tell us the radial velocity. The other three spectra and pictures from bottom to top show a nearby galaxy, a medium distance galaxy, and a distant galaxy. The pictures on the left are negatives, of course, so the brightest parts of the galaxies are black. Notice how the pattern of absorption lines shifts to the red as the galaxies get fainter. The numbers above and below the spectra are the measured wavelengths in nm [nanometers].
In the star which is at rest with respect to us, or in a laboratory standard, the line wavelengths are 393 & 397 nm from Ca II [ionized calcium]; 410, 434, 486 & 656 nm from H I [atomic hydrogen]; 518 nm from Mg I [neutral magnesium]; and 589 nm from Na I [neutral sodium]. By measuring the amount of the shift to the red, we can determine that the bright galaxy is moving away at 3,000 km/sec, which is 1 percent of the speed of light, because its lines are shifted in wavelength by 1 percent to the red. The redshift z is defined such that:
lambda(observed)
1+z = ----------------
lambda(emitted)
which is
397 401 414 438 491 523 595 663
1+z = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = --- = 1.01
393 397 410 434 486 518 589 656
in this case so z = 0.01 for the bright galaxy. The radial velocity is usually approximated by v(rad) = cz, where c is the speed of light, The medium bright galaxy is moving away at 15,000 km/sec with z = 0.05, while the faintest and most distant galaxy is moving away at 75,000 km/sec with z = 0.25. When z is larger than 1 then cz is faster than the speed of light and, while recession velocities faster than light are allowed, this approximation using cz as the recession velocity of an object is no longer valid. Thus for the largest known redshift of z=6.3, the recession velocity is not 6.3*c = 1,890,000 km/sec. It is also not the 285,254 km/sec given by the special relativistic Doppler formula 1+z = sqrt((1+v/c)/(1-v/c)). The actual recession velocity for this object depends on the cosmological parameters, but for an OmegaM=0.3 vacuum-dominated flat model the velocity is 585,611 km/sec. This is faster than light.
Shamlessly plagarized
Bwahahahah!
1busa
Registered
What happens to white when it encounters a black hole?
From my dunce stool :cookoo:
It goes back in time to 1985 in a delorian with Marty McFly.............
Similar threads
