All three are splendid sources of entertainment.
You left out CNN tho. Might wanna add that to the list.
All three are splendid sources of entertainment.
yea im not a big fan of Dershowitz but he's usually spot on when it comes to his legal opinion. its really comical that the affidavit does not include the injuries sustained to zimmerman or the grass stains on the back of his shirt. he's right its unethical and irresponsible of the prosecutors part.Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz Says Zimmerman Arrest Affidavit Is “
Professor Alan Dershowitz says the affidavit is 'thin and unethical'. He also thinks it will not get past the judge. Zim will claim 'stand your ground' immunity and that will allow him to challenge the evidence and charges validity before ever going to trial. A conviction on 2nd degree murder is all but impossible. And that comes from one of the most liberal anti gun folks in town. I believe he used the word 'Nifonged' in reference to the Duke Lacrosse fiasco and the prosecutor who tried to make a name for himself off the case.
That was my point. Usually Dershowitz is all too quick to jump on the side against the shooter/gun owner. If there was even a shred of a chance he'd be agreeing with them. For him to come out and say it like that is surprising.
That's your argument? That it's a "terrible source"...?
Would it help if the source was 'Merica's only righteous, true, correct, god-fearing, christian-loving, NASCAR-promoting, WWE-oriented news source... FOX News?
RIGHTEOUS FOX NEWS: Affidavit alleges George Zimmerman confronted Trayvon Martin
Now, the fact of the matter is: we don't know anything about this case other than a few basic facts - some audio tapes, a call by Zimmerman indicating he was following Martin, some indications of a struggle (with no information about how it started) and the shooting of Martin.
Nobody here is in any position to put those limited facts together to determine guilt or innocence. What we (public at large) have in the way of evidence or facts is fairly marginal. There are huge gaps in what we know and all of those gaps deal with the very issues that will determine guilt or innocence.
But let's not let that keep us from exonerating the shooter, assign guilt to the dead, and keep spreading the hate.
Perfect, isn't it?
All three are splendid sources of entertainment.
Your hate claims are just plain stupid as stated before.
This is my first and last post on this matter:
Even if race isn't a factor in this shooting, the wannabe cop volunteer can't pass the psych test neighborhood watch captain (complete with his gun and junior g-man badge) had no business approaching a person he felt threatened by, particularly after the dispatcher told him not to. No, it's not illegal to follow someone, but just because you can doesn't mean you should. Stand your ground shouldn't mean go looking for a fight.
By what has been posted in this and some other threads it is clearly evident that several members here have serious racist tendencies. No doubt emboldened by the anonymity of the internet they find it acceptable to voice thinly veiled statements showing condescension and animosity toward minorities that is pathetic and shows weakness of character. Research has shown that people who dislike others solely based on racial differences are less intelligent, less educated and occupy the lower rungs of economic status. If this shoe fits you, I have but one thing about which to inform you:
And here we go. The inherent truth about who was completely at fault for this....[URL="
The racist truth about Treyvon Martin[/URL]
Leave my rights out of this.
NHW don't carry.
Patrolling while armed violated the conditions of the CCP.
He was "in a place of nuisance".
I hope it falls back on the fact that he left his vehicle and stay away from the SYG law.
And here we go. The inherent truth about who was completely at fault for this....[URL="
The racist truth about Treyvon Martin[/URL]