Well with 21 riders its best to have 3 groups of 7. Now its impossible to say that all 7 riders in each group are equal with the riders in that group. But a line has to be drawn and a decision made.(Zuki @ Feb. 15 2007,09) How was the groupings created - by last years ranking, popularity, as it seems to me a few "A" list riders should be ""B" list riders...Take Hopkins for example. Why is Hopkins "A" list? I like Hopkins, but hasn't produced like 1 or 2 of the "B" list riders. And why the Heck is Pedrosa "A" list? Pedrosa should be "C" listed just for his n00b move with Nicky at the end of the season...lol
Just explain the structure to me and I will be content and live with the answer, Yes I'm trying to skew things a little so I can pick all my fav riders, but I have to try
We started with last years standings. But you can't leave it at that. Not all riders rode last year, not all teams were active last year, 990cc to 800cc, injuries and operations, the team's financial backing, pure talent vs hard working, experience vs not as much experience, 800cc testing, etc... it goes on and on.
There was no hard formula used. Racing is unpredictable and everyone here would have a different listing of groups.
I hope that helps. Basically, the groups are what they are