Guesses on rear wheel power after...?
- Thread starter stangman327
- Start date
I think 200 will be in the realm of what it will have once the tuners get hold of it.i see a lot of guys on here are quoting 200hp may be possible with new pipe and remap
i thought i would post this, no doubt subtitles will follow
Rider laughs his socks off after hearing above claims
(this vid always tickles my side)
The gen 2 can put out close to that and the gen 3 engine was worked over some...
mark3evo
Registered
i look forward to seeing the results April May
Jza
Registered
So kinda like the power a similar priced but ‘new’ (not 14 year old engine, suspension and frame) stock 1000 is putting out for the same ballpark money (but is 65kgs lighter)?
we have had our pants pulled down by Suzuki without even the offer of dinner first haven’t we lol...
You can look it that way however, the Hayabusa does a few things the liter bikes don't...you can leap aboard a Hayabusa ride some distances in relative comfort and not be affected as much by rough roads and wind.
I find liter bikes to be very purpose built.
If one were to delve into the aftermarket and go the turbo route, the Hayabusa platform is very suited for that.
Fair enough, though I was contextualising within the juxtapositioning of the axiomatic riding style of the co- correspondent
I see a lot of people getting hung up on the tb’s being 1mm smaller. That’s only one part of the equation. Factor in the larger air box volume, and longer intake runners we’ll likely find that they perform better. On paper, all those changes suggest to me that air velocity in to the combustion chambers should be improved. With the right engineering bigger isn’t always better in certain situations concerning fluid dynamics.
As far as injectors go, the gen 2 has 30% more injector then it needs in stock form. On the g3, as long as the injectors don’t go static, it doesn’t matter how much bigger or smaller they are.
i see a lot of guys on here are quoting 200hp may be possible with new pipe and remap
i thought i would post this, no doubt subtitles will follow
Rider laughs his socks off after hearing above claims
(this vid always tickles my side)
Im gonna bet 210-215whp with pipe, tune and degreeing the cams. I don’t think we will see those numbers until we’re able to have full control over the ecu tho. The g3 will have to use a power commander until someone cracks the ecu.
Ha, I wasn't being entirely serious.
But yes, very useful. Had it on a k1600.
One thing, it only stays on for 30 seconds apparently. Then you'd have to brake manually?
Brochure also states HHC comes on automatically?
That would be neat.
Hayabusa Wannabe
Registered
Why degree the cams in a new engine? Is the factory inaccurate or is their intentional setting a compromise? I suppose that you must pull this engine to degree the cams and so that is a much bigger bill than without it.
Suzuki already said they advanced the exhaust cam to reduce valve overlap.
Any time you do that in a busa engine it changes where the engine makes peak torque, and lowers peak horsepower overall. Notice how suzuki continually talked about the new engines increase in torque? That’s why.
you can degree them in the bike. It’s not as easy as it being out obviously, but very doable.
I wonder will someone be able to swap out the cams from a gen 2??
Probably, but the exhaust cam in the g3 has more lift. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s identical to the intake cam now. Plus more lift on an exhaust cam is ideal for boost.
Similar threads
