Irrelevant. You were banned at MM for talking nonsense. Your doing the same thing here.
I was banned by many websites me discussing FI theory. I use my own concepts since no one can open the book, look at that 6th gear being used as their default signal. I've already shifted gears to watch the sub system move via gear change, not fuel trim change. Remember, you remove the GPS from the loop (unplug it) the fuel trim remains the same. GPS is for the air gate(s) for both bikes. Busa uses the air cleaner gate, Kawi uses the sub [gate] in the throttle body. Same principal of controlling air speed.
Its been proven twice I can recall the gps sensor on a kaw and a suz do not function the same.
I think I just explained why the gate is used? To control air speed via what gear you are in. Period! So, you need to explain to me, how the soft and hard are applied, so you can see, you wire the GPS with a tre, you set the 6th like it says in the book. Now, if you are spreading a falsehood, you either plead the 5th you cannot find that theory they use the 5th gear map, where I show proof that the factory says it is set for 6th as per page. Show my your page of info that states the 5th or take the 5th someone is lying to the public.
A tre locks the ecu in 5th.
By print or buy hearsay? And you wonder why the controversy about the tre if I can show proof I keep bringing up the 6th in both Busa and Kawi code pages. No other place is there any mention of a 5th gear in either book, does it? Well, doit?
What's the point of your 6th limp fi light nonsense. None of its true. Unless every member here that has a tre and it seems there are more than a few have fi lights showing and don't care? Or that the resistor being wired in is really the secret noone but you had unlocked and everyone is running 6th map but they're derestricted top speed?
Here is where I see you have no clue about the laws of ohm or basic wiring as it pertains to a short and how the ECU controls the move. GPS is the limiter loop. You remove the gear catcher, the rpm will be set in the soft. Look at the map software where you can alter the maps made. You now can set the de-restrict via the spark limiter to the hard, semi-unlimited... Sans going into the software, drill down to the max rpm limit and install that into the X to Y pattern. Even the bike's gear window defaults to the number 6, not 5th gear as the fallacy says. Unless you can prove by some factory shop manual that explains the practical and describes in the abstract the short sentences that state why... And the reason the info is so little to explain in the FSM is that there is enough to follow through the rest if you grasp the initial abstract if any.
As far as the carb discussion. Who cares. Busa has never had a carb so the theory is irrelevant.
I disagree. How can you pull theory for FI function without a slight basic knowledge of fuel feed to the Otto engine. But if you started out with windows 7, had no clue how win95 worked, well, are not the two platforms basically the same? You are looking at the evolution of fuel feed. The more you know, the easier to apply theory from one to the other.
The 02 watt nonsense your spewing seems to me to be from the mil coming on from removing cats? You can throw the rear 02s in the trash since they can be disabled in the ecu, or yet again are you ready for this trade secret. You can put a resistor in the rear 02s and it eliminates the code.
See, the 02 acts as a resistor. Removing that alone is to match that loop read back to the ECU so it plots correct in the analog. You send it any other read, it defaults to it's digital internal read as your backup/fail-safe mode. So, I had fun dissing the car boys that are in the same boat, they cannot figure out what the ECU needs to read as per FSM. One Ohm's Law after the other is chase your tail making up so many resistors that code right back to the dash locked in the number 6 is both universal in the bike ECU as is the car EC U get it yet? Same FI rules apply. Carbs abide by the same rules of vacuum/pressure as you apply that theory to a clogged jet hole.
Can you please state clearly what the purpose of this nonsense is? I see no point in any post you have ever made in any tre thread. You have some decent info in other threads it seems but the nonsense you ramble in here is pathetic.
Look at the thread title. This says, if you made a home made tre, have a problem with it, then you need the theory to repair whatever you tied into to untie it, you now know the concept to repair FI.
Plain and simple is I take info from the FSM so I am indisputable how the bike functions. How do you think I got to figuring out the bike and how to troubleshoot each part of the bike, from wheel to wheel is know basic theory you can follow. I did not say FI was simple to follow. It is so complex, you try to explain it then.
And if you fluff right out of the gate with the 5th gear fallacy, you need first to show proof before you continue discussing TRE theory. Only one theory is correct. I think I will stick to the book. Why? Because I heard someone say the bike will lean out and damage said bike if not rejetted. HA! That was one more "hearsay" I have pointed out as both the lean theory is more someone repeating someone else and their whack theory of air. Same goes with the 5th gear deal is a whack theory if the FSM points out 6th.
Bottom line... If you cannot comprehend the pages in the FSM, then do not point at me, I can repair said complex vehicle with said book in hand. I am no engineer. I am a backyard mechanic that is self taught. I can hold my own.
Maybe I throw a pile on you all at once is expose theory on top of theory as I go
Follow in the book then. I never steer away from that practical event is that it runs in the absolute way the bike functions. You need to prove I do not know bike theory from wheel to wheel. You might stump me on a few things, but watt I know, I know pretty well to get me bye year tune up or I could not fling this in your face...