I've decided against the Sony. Thinkin bout a 50" LG plasma for $1659 or 47" LG lcd $1329
i could be dated with my info. but just to give you some insight on flat screens, the plasma would be a better picture but will disapate over time whereas the LCD will last and then the bulb will just burn out. i personally, would rather sacrifice for an LCD and knowing that someday i could replace the bulb for a few hundred bucks than stare at a paper weight plasma which would be non fixable when it burns in. panasonic is one of the best for the "affordability" and "reliability" factor. check with consumer reports for fairly accurate testing.
I have a plasma and a LCD that displays at 120HZ (120Hz HDMI wires are $140 for 3 feet it's ridiculus). The only differance I can tell is the plasma shows a truer black. I just got the LCD for video games plasmas are still prone to burn in.
120Hz HDMI wires? lol An HDMI wire is a HDMI wire is a HDMI wire. There is no such thing. Its purely marketing. You should go and kick the guy that told you to buy them in the balls.
Besides lets think about this logically. Its a 120Hz TV. It does this "frame doubling" internally. What in the world would a cable have to do with anything? A $5 dollar HDMI cable sends the same 1's and 0's as a the 200 dollar monster or any other cable.
Sorry it just kills me to hear this.
120Hz HDMI wires? lol An HDMI wire is a HDMI wire is a HDMI wire. There is no such thing. Its purely marketing. You should go and kick the guy that told you to buy them in the balls.
Besides lets think about this logically. Its a 120Hz TV. It does this "frame doubling" internally. What in the world would a cable have to do with anything? A $5 dollar HDMI cable sends the same 1's and 0's as a the 200 dollar monster or any other cable.
Sorry it just kills me to hear this.