I pray you never go down, and your head hit the pavement, you'll wish you had one on for that last instant of your life.
If your involved in a crash and die on the scene, then the untreated death is different than suffering massive head injuries and in ICU for weeks BEFORE succumbing to the injuries. Florida laws states you must have insurance covering motorcycle injuries in order to ride helmetless. If you have no insurance, you &/or your family are responsible. Can't pay? Taxpayer suffers. It does affect everyone if you chose to ride without a helmet AND do not have insurance coverage. I ride without a helmet depending on the circumstance but I have plenty of insurance coverage and realize the consequences of doing so. Freedom of choice, gotta love it. Responsibility, gotta love that too!(mzrsq @ Jun. 30 2007,23:04)I'm in no way saying I'm right, just giving you a point of view of why some do not.(pward76 @ Jun. 30 2007,22:54) Do I think the government should legislate helmets? No, but ONLY if they require those not wearing them to prove that they are insured so that society is indemnified from their damages and medical bills.
And the above statement has always amused me.
How is my medically untreated death more expensive that your treatment to recovery given equivalent circumstances. we both crash the same crash, I die from no helmet, you survive. My injuries obviously require no treatment other than a pine box and services......Yours could beyears of rehab. As or the bikes themselves, they'd be equal loss so I can't see where this statement holds any real world weight, just more mumble jumble of I'm right for wearing and you're an idiot.
I'm not saying you are an idiot, and I appreciate your point of view.(mzrsq @ Jun. 30 2007,20:04)I'm in no way saying I'm right, just giving you a point of view of why some do not.(pward76 @ Jun. 30 2007,22:54) Do I think the government should legislate helmets? No, but ONLY if they require those not wearing them to prove that they are insured so that society is indemnified from their damages and medical bills.
And the above statement has always amused me.
How is my medically untreated death more expensive that your treatment to recovery given equivalent circumstances. we both crash the same crash, I die from no helmet, you survive. My injuries obviously require no treatment other than a pine box and services......Yours could beyears of rehab. As or the bikes themselves, they'd be equal loss so I can't see where this statement holds any real world weight, just more mumble jumble of I'm right for wearing and you're an idiot.
I see your point here.............while driving or riding uninsured is illegal in I believe all states, and those that do choose to drive or ride uninsured are a complete other equation. I'm fully insured on everything I own with plenty of life insurance on top.(pward76 @ Jul. 01 2007,23:09)I'm not saying you are an idiot, and I appreciate your point of view.(mzrsq @ Jun. 30 2007,20:04)I'm in no way saying I'm right, just giving you a point of view of why some do not.(pward76 @ Jun. 30 2007,22:54) Do I think the government should legislate helmets? No, but ONLY if they require those not wearing them to prove that they are insured so that society is indemnified from their damages and medical bills.
And the above statement has always amused me.
How is my medically untreated death more expensive that your treatment to recovery given equivalent circumstances. we both crash the same crash, I die from no helmet, you survive. My injuries obviously require no treatment other than a pine box and services......Yours could beyears of rehab. As or the bikes themselves, they'd be equal loss so I can't see where this statement holds any real world weight, just more mumble jumble of I'm right for wearing and you're an idiot.
It's not mumbo jumbo either. It's different if I wear a helmet and my insurance covers my injuries. If an uninsured, helmetless rider incurs liabilities that he (or she) cannot cover, society ends up with the bill.
I am asking that if you don't want to wear a helmet, that you insure yourself so that if, God forbid, you go down and end up in a vegetative state, the rest of us do not get stuck with the tab for years of hospitalization.
If you have insurance, more power to you.
Ride free? Cool. With freedom comes responsibility - that's all I'm saying.
I wear my helmet, but I do agree with some of the people that do not ride with one. It should be your choice! Our government is getting to the point that they are telling us what we can and can not do more and more on a daily basis! That is not right!(Poppy @ Jul. 01 2007,13:23)If your involved in a crash and die on the scene, then the untreated death is different than suffering massive head injuries and in ICU for weeks BEFORE succumbing to the injuries. Florida laws states you must have insurance covering motorcycle injuries in order to ride helmetless. If you have no insurance, you &/or your family are responsible. Can't pay? Taxpayer suffers.(mzrsq @ Jun. 30 2007,23:04)I'm in no way saying I'm right, just giving you a point of view of why some do not.(pward76 @ Jun. 30 2007,22:54) Do I think the government should legislate helmets? No, but ONLY if they require those not wearing them to prove that they are insured so that society is indemnified from their damages and medical bills.
And the above statement has always amused me.
How is my medically untreated death more expensive that your treatment to recovery given equivalent circumstances. we both crash the same crash, I die from no helmet, you survive. My injuries obviously require no treatment other than a pine box and services......Yours could beyears of rehab. As or the bikes themselves, they'd be equal loss so I can't see where this statement holds any real world weight, just more mumble jumble of I'm right for wearing and you're an idiot.
The reason I hear from my Dad (Harley rider) is that he can't stand the full face, can't see with it on, so he rides with the half helmet...(Rayabusa0818 @ Jun. 30 2007,16:56)I would be interested in hearing his reason for not wearing one. We take enough risk just riding...I want every ounce of protection I can wear.(Slicksnchicks @ Jun. 30 2007,16:44) I ride with my father who's in his 60's now...He wont wear a helmet for anything. Raining out, night time doesnt matter he wont wear it... He's sick of hearin me bitch i'm sick of bitchin....guess its like talkin to smokers...gonna do what they wanna do...
It's the same reason for people who won't wear a seatbelt, the purely illogical excuses:(busa_bill @ Jun. 30 2007,15:42) I just don't understand why people won't wear a lid.
Interesting.(Poppy @ Jul. 01 2007,07:26) A good helmet law site.....