RedBull
Registered
Wow,
this is definitely
a positive side !
Been seriously kicking around
the idea to sell the Hayabusa,
mainly so I can fund the
SLC build to get it finished ,
then a year after that
purchase a gen 3
assuming it is out .
Wow,
this is definitely
a positive side !
Been seriously kicking around
the idea to sell the Hayabusa,
mainly so I can fund the
SLC build to get it finished ,
then a year after that
purchase a gen 3
assuming it is out .
Have you guys seen the new gen 2 ?
Nothing that big .
Color changes .
Smoother throttle .
B N G *
Both Kawasaki and BMW have the right idea
where they use the same power train on multiple platforms .
Suzuki followed with the GSX-S, F
and now Katana-the GSX might become
the "bread and butter" platform .
Maybe Suzuki is going to step
out of the hyper bike game .
They probably figure
where does it stop ?
300 hp , 400 hp ,
nobody would insure it
so few would buy it .
so that is the power for sure no BS?270 hp and TORQUE would kill the competition.. that h2 is like 80 or 90 foot pounds of torque... not impressive
I read that the H2 has about
100 pounds of torque
( and weighs 570 wet ) .
The numbers look similar
to the hyper sport bikes .
I take it the HP
and torque figures
are to the wheels ?
what I meant was... a gen3 hayabusa that had 270hp and gobs of torque would be faster than a 90 foot pounds of torque h2... AT THE WHEEL an H2 makes about 190 HP and 90-92 foot pounds of torque.. at least in 2015 those were the real numbers here... https://www.cycleworld.com/2015/11/...torcycle-dyno-run-video-and-performance-chart FURTHERMORE a hayabusa makes more torque down low... its just about these best motor to throw HP atso that is the power for sure no BS?
Usually advertised numbers are never wheel #s....I take it the answer is yes, it is to the wheels..thanks.
Even if is has that kind of power, it is still an ugly bike.
Usually advertised numbers are never wheel #s