These are the types of threads I like!
**** Warning - not for the eyes of the adept drag-racer!!! ****
Roll-outs can be pretty confusing. I myself with my Zx-9 have found a sweet spot on the tree (where I leave) and my position on the starting line. The only thing that ever changes this combination or my approach to staging is roll-out. The change usually comes when I race different tracks. At my home track my method of staging and leaving nets me anything from a .415 to a .450 light. Sometimes when it gets darker and my eyes pick-up the bulb a little sooner I go into the .40's. This is standard practice and goes for all but a few tracks I race at.
The flip side to this is the tracks I race that don't seem to have similar roll-outs. One track that I noticed was a little inconsistent for me was Las Vegas (old track). I would run out of the right lane a cut my standard lights, then jump over to the left lane and be 2-3 hundredths off. In this case the left lane seemed a bit "loose" in it's roll-out. Probably the way the beam picked up (or lost) my front tire was a tad or a fraction of a second diferrent than the other lane. Maybe it was a fraction of an inch longer between the staging and the timing beams.... or maybe the way the track lays out there's a reflection or shadow which makes the pick-up a little harder... or maybe the light sits a fraction of an inch higher and it takes that fraction of a second longer for the tire to roll out of the beam.
Staging is almost a science. If I am running a "pro-tree" (getting all the ambers at once), I run out of the deep stage. This means I light both pairs of staging beams, then roll thru and take out the top pair of staging lights. With this method I leave on pure reaction from receiving the lights. If I run a "full-tree" (the ambers counting down), then I stage normally. When I receive the bottom amber I leave. But here, instead of it being a pure reaction launch, I make sure to "see" more of the light. In both staging cases, I run a shallow position in the beams.... which means I just barely light the amber and stop. To me, this makes me more consistent because I have a definate spot where I stage. A lot of guys just don't pay attention where they're at in the beams and wonder why they aren't real consistent in their 60 footers and reaction times. Follow this....
Where you stage defintely determines reaction times and e.t.'s... or more importantly... 60 footers. By leaving from the normal shallow stage position you actually get a bit of a "run" at the timing clocks. By going in deep, I can cut a better reaction time because I am closer to the timing beam, but shed a tenth or tenth and a half from my e.t. because I don't get that 6 inch run. For the bracket racer who dials his time, this way can work a little better. I can cut the better light, then dial a little "softer" or slower to compensate for slower e.t. For the guy who is looking the fastest... quickest.... e.t., the shallower you can stage the better. Just barely light the second set of staging lights and stop! This will ensure your biggest run at the lights.
My best advice for the "drag racer" is to be focussed. When I run my tire back into the water, it's all about me! I don't even know the other guy is over there... nor do I care. I go about my business, stage my bike, cut my light and hope it's enough. I look at one light... the bottom amber. I don't ever hear the other bike.... even bikes on two-steps I can block-out.
I staged my bike at Pomona last year and had an interesting thing happen. I was running a pro-tree in the finals and set my concentration on the bottom amber. By mistake, the tower gave us a full-tree and my competitor was off at seeing the top bulb. I actually didn't even see either the top or middle bulbs and left at seeing the bottom amber which I was focussed on. Interesting enough, all the lights were in my field of vision, as well as my competitor when she left. This was the first time I actually realized how glued I get on the line.
I think that's it for now.....whew
[This message has been edited by fastzx9 (edited 02 January 2000).]