i have a half a dozen slow race trophies you can borrow to take to court.
i have not only stopped feet up, but have stopped and gone backwards a few feet. (always wanted to go simipro trials
)
Oregon just passed a motorcycle profiling bill, if you think you right, fight the ticket. if you ran the sinn, just freakin pay it. your guilty. the officer WILL show up to court. don't play that game its dumb.
in the end; if your right your right. if not, pay the piper.
Motorcycle profiling bill? Hmm.
Let me be clear. I am guilty...technically.
On the other hand, I know what rolling a stop sign is, and I didn't do that.
I went from about 30mph to the sign, grabbed the front brake.... down to almost zero (now using rear brake), checked the intersection at "balance speed" before going over the line, then proceeded.
I wasn't stopped, but I was pretty darned close to being stopped, and I think most hear know what I mean. I was going about as fast as my 88 year old grandfather used to be able to push his walker before he died.... painfully slow.
What's the difference?
Well rolling a light (not coming to a complete stop) to me is where you slow for signs that you don't really intend to stop for.
What I did was make a stop that for all purposes was an intentional stop while keeping just enough forward roll to allow me to keep the bike upright without putting my feet down. As most of us know, that can be slow enough that someone could almost reach out and unscrew your air valve cap.
So the difference is in the discretion of the officer. The point of the law is to make the roads safer, and I can promise you that what I did was not less safe than putting my feet down.
When I get angry is when the purpose of the law is abused to generate revenue or inflate egos.
I ride around on this 215hp turbo Hayabusa and don't break the speed limit the grand share of the time... it gets frustrating. Cars pass me all the time because I'm trying to be law abiding, yet I eat a $246 ticket because a police department that does next to nothing in the area needs a nicer coffee room to sit in while showing off their quotas?
I'm libertarian and yes, I get really excited about unappropriated taxes.
Really, peeing on a tree in a forest next to a road is illegal too and we now live in a country where a person should piss their pants in their car for FEAR of punishment? The idea is that people should not consider forests as approved public restrooms....OK...makes sense, but if someone has really got to go (ever been there?), should they soil themselves and vehicle? That is why officers are given discretion.
Now if the officer is excited about the unfortunate condition of your bladder because it makes their life better at your expense...even though you are already paying their salary, then is this really what the people need? I don't think so. "I'm sorry but it's the law" and all the versions of that I've heard over the years are usually the fallback line for simply being a jerk and a leech on humanity.
That said, I am friends with a lot of cops, and a lot of cops get it. It's the one's who don't... the fraternal "us against the public" cops that I just can't stand.
At the same time, as a bar owner... I've witnessed at least 3 times where a cop was getting sexual favors in their patrol cars to sway their "discretion" in regards to an intoxicated female. Real heroes. Ya. Happens all the time.
Sean