TallTom
Registered
If only it were that easy!Long before the invasion, he banned a number of news agencies and TV stations, as he did not like their reporting.
If only it were that easy!Long before the invasion, he banned a number of news agencies and TV stations, as he did not like their reporting.
If only it were that easy!
Exactly....all these Hollywood actors who think the world will stop and listen to anything and everything they say are living in a real dream....I don't normally care a rats ass about the Oscars. But I do hope Sean Penn puts his Oscars up for smelting.
Too many people in Hollywood think they belong in Politics.
And think they should lead people by what they think, simply because they are Hollywood.
I did respect Sean Penn. But per usual they take things too far.
Smelt them dude.
In all the dealings within the Baltics, I have noticed the people are very high strung and militant....it took very little to set off a powder-keg of violence....He is a bit of an autocrat as well, it simply is in their heritage.
Long before the invasion, he banned a number of news agencies and TV stations, as he did not like their reporting.
I saw the president of Ukraine demanding more arms and asking the west if they were scared of Moscow.....
After receiving millions upon millions of dollars of arms and equipment and NATO countries allowing citizens to join his "international brigade" one would think he'd be a little more grateful...
....and I guess the fact eludes him that NATO incursion directly engaging Russian troops in Ukraine would initiate WW3 where millions would definitely die...
Words. Pretty tough to take his words as anything else. He's right. Putin is a dangerous, unhinged leader of a powerful nation. The timing of his statement is not good.Some people are bright enough to not try and pick every word a person says and make a literal mission to tell us what they said.
I know Biden didn't say overthrow a government. I merely point out how the media won't spend days trying to say he did mean that. If Cheeto head would have said the exact same thing, he would be skewered for saying "overthrow" Putin.
And I agree he should not be in power. But we all know the hot buttons that get pushed when a president in opposition says it.Words. Pretty tough to take his words as anything else. He's right. Putin is a dangerous, unhinged leader of a powerful nation. The timing of his statement is not good.
LOL, what did Lindsey Graham say about Putin.And I agree he should not be in power. But we all know the hot buttons that get pushed when a president in opposition says it.
Even in the case of Biden or Trump. They don't actually say something, but people are too much like sheep and try and hear what someone tells them to hear. I'll never forget when Trump turned to his medical person asking, in passing, if there was any way we can inject like bleach into a person. She said no. Within 24 hours almost every source claimed he told us to inject bleach into our veins.
Biden never said overthrow Putin. People just go there.
If there was a popularity contest based on personality, I would think Biden will do really well. He sure is more politically rounded than the previous guy.Only the weak live by poll numbers and. Smart people are informed by polls not driven by them. And, I the futility of worrying about being popular in high school. Heck, I've been in many places where people resented me just being there at all because I was Black. That's how I came to the conclusion "I'd rather be hated for who I am than loved for who I'm not". See there, I quoted myself, not some arbitrary internet meme.
Anyway, the data clearly shows that Democratic presidents perform better as a group than republicans. The one thing republicans do well is run up the debt trying to increase the wealth gap and maintain feudal capitalism. It doesn't matter how many people realize that, those are the facts. Besides, Trump isn't a republican. He does not represent republican values (when they actually had values). If you were a true republican, believing in conservative values you would be supporting Liz Chenny. She is far-right leaning, very conservative, and has proven her commitment to her country and its constitution. She has the courage to realize sometimes everyone is wrong.
So I say again, man up.
Interesting chess game. Putin has lost a lot of pawns, wait to see if he is going to use his queen.Does anyone remember Ronald Regan saying to bomb Russia into an open mic? They always say this was a mistake but behind the scenes, it's a tactical game being played. What is scary and new is that Russian military leaders are not talking to us. Generally, politics is an inexact science and can be a liability in critical battlefield decisions. The backdoor communication network has always been a failsafe to prevent overreactions.
With the war going so badly for Russia, the command of the military is on pins and needles and noone wants to be the guy flying outside Putin's control. That is a very dangerous situation, one we have not been in for a long time.
When have you seen 6k people arrested in a mass protest in Russia? Or a reporter walking across a major news broadcast with anti- Putin rhetoric? Ukraine has already determined NATO is not going to work. NATO is still worried there are too many Russians to trust Ukraine with full membership. Given this Zelenskyy has little choice but to agree to give up NATO rather than extend the war.Interesting chess game. Putin has lost a lot of pawns, wait to see if he is going to use his queen.
For saying the wrong things at the wrong time referring to Biden, I guess we have to agree that Trump did that almost daily.
What is concerning is that Putin seems to still have great support within Russia as well as a few other countries. Biden’s comment plays perfectly into his chess strategy of false propaganda. He can use that comment to justify that the West and NATO is determined to change the regime in Russia and hence Ukraine cannot be friends with NATO on his border.
A tank in urban warfare or wide open areas against cheap drones is an easy target, drones will be fighting the next few wars replacing, tanks and helicopters. Tanks are a thing of the past and a easy target.Only from the perspective of an ineffective military operation...
Tanks most definitely have their place on the battlefield-ground can't be taken without them.
What we are not seeing is an infantry presence....they are what protect the tanks by neutralizing the anti-tank systems...
What we are seeing in Ukraine is a military which was being spoon fed advanced anti-armor systems and have lots of supply...in reality, they are heavy and large to carry around and if the advancing military is doing their job effectively, the defending military won't be as effective using them.
The Taliban and ISIS had advanced anti-armor systems but were ineffective because they were harrassed by ground forces/drones which were actively seeking out such systems.
You sound pretty matter of fact and confident....how can I rebut against that with 33 yrs of military experience?A tank in urban warfare or wide open areas against cheap drones is an easy target, drones will be fighting the next few wars replacing, tanks and helicopters. Tanks are a thing of the past and a easy target.
Things have changed in the last 5 years a lot no offence, Ukraine proved that tanks and helicopters are a dying breed. Hard to shoot down a small drone with an expensive stinger.You sound pretty matter of fact and confident....how can I rebut against that with 33 yrs of military experience?
...and.....I disagree....drones have their place and have been in operation for years yet armor is still on the battlefield...drones in a modern battlefield are not infallible. There are defenses against drones and other electronic systems.
No offense taken....I've kept up on the situation and by no means use the invasion of Ukraine as an example of capabilities and operational levels of modern militaries.Things have changed in the last 5 years a lot no offence, Ukraine proved that tanks and helicopters are a dying breed. Hard to shoot down a small drone with an expensive stinger.
The controversy around the subject of evolution has been going on for a long time and whatever the truth is about it its my belief that all the facts are still not known on the subject... I take it you still subscribe to Darwinism... Meanwhile, Lara has probably dug up something... but, I don't have time for it. However, other sources mentioned two US funded bio labs were found in Ukraine that Lara brought to light. If true, how come we never heard about it?Here’s your Lara Logan…
Fox Nation’s Lara Logan Suggests Theory of Evolution Is a Hoax Funded by Jews
Lara Logan's latest anti-Semitic dog whistle is a claim that Charles Darwin only came up with the idea of evolution because Jews paid him towww.yahoo.com