youkoolele
Registered
the post is about the fact that the both bike without fuel, the supposedly 15 kgs heavier bking is in fact 7 pounds lighter, and the fact that the bking has a smaller tank; thats all
suzuki is officially incorrect on busa weight!
- Thread starter youkoolele
- Start date
si-lo
Registered
I really didn't see that you were making a comparison between the B-king and Busa. I thought you were just using the B-king as another example of incorrect weight by suzuki.
You are correct real world numbers do matter to some people, but most of those people just weigh their bike and ignore the mfr numbers, much less call out said mfr on a forum dedicated to said bike.
And I find it funny that you call Ruthless a stupid ass and yet you're the one with the question to which "most" people already know the answer. At least most people I know.
You are correct real world numbers do matter to some people, but most of those people just weigh their bike and ignore the mfr numbers, much less call out said mfr on a forum dedicated to said bike.
And I find it funny that you call Ruthless a stupid ass and yet you're the one with the question to which "most" people already know the answer. At least most people I know.
BusaBradCO
Registered
Are we supposed to be upset?
Re: suzuki is officially incorrect on busa weight!
I wiegh 260lbs and ride a Busa.If i do not drink water /beer for a week,take a couple good craps I wiegh 240lbs.Did I lie when i told my wife I only wiegh 240lbs.
Damn I just realized with me on the bike thats almost half a ton.
I wiegh 260lbs and ride a Busa.If i do not drink water /beer for a week,take a couple good craps I wiegh 240lbs.Did I lie when i told my wife I only wiegh 240lbs.
Damn I just realized with me on the bike thats almost half a ton.
Re: suzuki is officially incorrect on busa weight!
H.E.L.L.O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dry weight is exactly what it says, "DRY"! No brake fluid, no fork fluid, no battery, no radiator fluids, Nada, NOTHING!
Apparently you have the opinion if the fuel tank is dry, that means "Dry Weight"! Do a little research and know your subject before you begin the name calling!
And one other thing I may point out! Once you begin the name calling you loose all credibility!
stfu stupid ass, i think most people would agree that actual realworld numbers IS usefull informations, if not then ill shut up
People these daysAnd YOURE the one giving **** to people at work
H.E.L.L.O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dry weight is exactly what it says, "DRY"! No brake fluid, no fork fluid, no battery, no radiator fluids, Nada, NOTHING!
Apparently you have the opinion if the fuel tank is dry, that means "Dry Weight"! Do a little research and know your subject before you begin the name calling!
And one other thing I may point out! Once you begin the name calling you loose all credibility!
Re: suzuki is officially incorrect on busa weight!
Youkoolele hasnt posted for almost a year, Methinks he might be long gone
Youkoolele hasnt posted for almost a year, Methinks he might be long gone
jdsbusa
Registered
Curb weight is what you should be looking at....the '09/08 is rated at 573lbs....that's fluids, battery, and yes, air in tires. 
Like Warbird, I plopped my fatty on the scale at Wheelers (the Gap) and showed 544lbs topped off with gas. Only major mod to lose weight is a titanium M4 full exhaust, but all my other mods have easily packed back on 10 pounds of what I originally lost. ???
Like Warbird, I plopped my fatty on the scale at Wheelers (the Gap) and showed 544lbs topped off with gas. Only major mod to lose weight is a titanium M4 full exhaust, but all my other mods have easily packed back on 10 pounds of what I originally lost. ???
Similar threads
